Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38703278›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Knowledge, attitude, and perception of robotic-assisted surgery among the general population in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.

Abdulaziz A Arishi, Ibrahim A Hakami, Hassan N Mashbari, Alhassan H Hobani, Hafiz I Al-Musawa, Rana I Abuhadi, Atheer H Maslouf, Mohammed H Matari, Hakema T Albrahim, Maram A Algarni and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abdulaziz A ArishiGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Abdulaziz.arishimd@gmail.com.
Ibrahim A HakamiGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan N MashbariGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Alhassan H HobaniFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Hafiz I Al-MusawaFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Rana I AbuhadiFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Atheer H MasloufFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed H MatariFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Hakema T AlbrahimFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Maram A AlgarniFaculty of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Othamn IskanderGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid AlyahyawiGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized surgical practices, with robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) significantly advancing. However, the understanding and acceptance of RAS vary, impacting its widespread adoption. This study aims to assess Saudi Arabians' attitudes and comprehension of RAS, which is crucial for promoting its integration into surgical procedures. A cross-sectional study was conducted in various Saudi Arabian cities. A total of 1449 participants were included, while participants with cognitive issues were excluded. Demographic information, knowledge, technology experience, attitudes, and perceptions about RAS were collected using an online self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Of the participants, 51.1% demonstrated awareness of RAS, mainly through social media (36.9%). Factors influencing awareness included gender, education, income, occupation, computer literacy, and technology comfort. Gender disparities were evident in attitudes and perceptions toward RAS. Concerns about RAS included robot malfunction (62.0%), surgical errors (45.4%), and surgeon competency (44.7%). 36.4% of the participants believe RAS is faster, 29.9% believe RAS is less painful, and 25.3% believe RAS has fewer complications. Positive perceptions encompassed the belief that robot-using surgeons are more skilled (44.5%) and hospitals offering RAS are better (54.3%). Notably, 47.7% expressed willingness to consider RAS as a treatment option. The study underscores the significance of promoting awareness and informed decisions to ensure the successful integration of RAS in surgical practices. Addressing concerns and misconceptions and enhancing public comprehension are pivotal for facilitating informed decision-making and fostering RAS acceptance within Saudi Arabia's surgical landscape.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAwarenessGender disparitiesPublic perceptionRobotic-assisted surgerySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.