Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38703277›Full record

ReviewGeroScience2024

Evaluating osteoporosis and bone quality in the aging spine: modern considerations for surgical management in the geriatric population.

Miles Hudson, Jenna Meyer, Alexander Evans, Chandan Krishna, Zachary A Smith, Joshua Bakhsheshian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miles HudsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA. Hudson.Miles@mayo.edu.
Jenna MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Alexander EvansDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Chandan KrishnaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Zachary A SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Joshua BakhsheshianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical management paradigms of spinal pathologies in the aging population carry inherent substantial risks, with surgical complications being more prevalent among patients with osteoporosis compared to those with normal bone mineral density. In this narrative review, we aim to highlight important clinical understanding and considerations in perioperative evaluation and management of patients elected to undergo spinal surgery. Osteoporosis is a well-defined risk factor for mechanical complications following spinal surgery, and as such, perioperative optimization of bone health in the setting of surgery for geriatric patients remains a critical research area alongside intraoperative surgical augmentation techniques. Surgical techniques to circumvent challenges with instrumentation of poor bone mineral density have included augmentation of pedicle screw fixation, including segmental bicortical screw fixation techniques, cement augmentation with fenestrated screws, or use of expandable pedicle screws to improve bone-implant interface. Judicious selection of treatment modalities and subsequent perioperative optimization is paramount to minimize surgical complications. Contemporary guidelines and evolving paradigms in perioperative evaluation, optimization, and management of the aging spine include the advent of quantitatively evaluating computed tomography (CT) via assessment of the magnitude of Hounsfield units. Prescribing pharmacotherapeutic agents and monitoring bone health requires a multidisciplinary team approach, including endocrinologists and geriatricians to coordinate high-quality care for advanced-age patients who require surgical management of their spinal disorders.

Indexed as

Bone DensityOsteoporosisAgedAgingHumansRisk FactorsSpineBone densityFixationFragility fractureGeriatricKyphosisOsteoporosisT-score

Identifiers

PMID38703277
PMCPMC11336023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.