Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38703230›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Perceptions of theatre team members to robotic assisted surgery and the aid of technology in colorectal surgery.

Shreya Kulkarni, RobOLaP study  research group collective, Oliver Claydon, Christina Delimpalta, Jane McCulloch, Gabrielle C Thorpe, Dolly Dowsett, Wanda Ward, Adam Stearns, James Hernon and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shreya KulkarniSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. miss.shreya.kulkarni@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-9406
RobOLaP study  research group collective
Oliver ClaydonSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-5337
Christina DelimpaltaSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Jane McCullochSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Gabrielle C ThorpeSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Dolly DowsettSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Wanda WardSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Adam StearnsSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-7360
James HernonSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Sandeep KapurSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Milind KulkarniDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Irshad ShaikhSir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of robotic assisted surgery (RAS) has brought in a change to the perception and roles of theatre staff, as well as the dynamics of the operative environment and team. This study aims to identify and describe current perceptions of theatre staff in the context of RAS. 12 semi-structured interviews were conducted in a tertiary level university hospital, where RAS is utilised in selected elective settings. Interviews were conducted by an experienced research nurse to staff of the colorectal department operating theatre (nursing, surgical and anaesthetics) with some experience in operating within open, laparoscopic and RAS surgical settings. Thematic analysis on all interviews was performed, with formation of preliminary themes. Respondents all discussed advantages of all modes of operating. All respondents appreciated the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, in the reduced physiological insult to patients. However, interviewees remarked on the current perceived limitations of RAS in terms of logistics. Some voiced apprehension and anxieties about the safety if an operation needs to be converted to open. An overarching theme with participants of all levels and backgrounds was the 'Teamwork' and the concept of the [robotic] team. The physical differences of RAS changes the traditional methods of communication, with the loss of face-to-face contact and the physical 'separation' of the surgeon from the rest of the operating team impacting theatre dynamics. It is vital to understand the staff cultures, concerns and perception to the use of this relatively new technology in colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryOperating RoomsPatient Care TeamRobotic Surgical ProceduresAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansLaparoscopyPerceptionColorectal surgeryLaparoscopic surgeryLaparotomyRobotic surgeryStaff perceptions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.