ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024
The curvature quantification of wave I in auditory brainstem responses detects cochlear synaptopathy in human beings.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consequences and Mechanisms of Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss, With Focuses on Signal Perception in Noise and Temporal Processing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Can Mismatch Negativity Be Used as an Indicator to Predict Central Auditory Deficits in Individuals with Normal Hearing?Audiology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients with age-related hearing loss complain often about reduced speech perception in adverse listening environment. Studies on animals have suggested that cochlear synaptopathy may be one of the primary mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon. A decreased wave I amplitude in supra-threshold auditory brainstem response (ABR) can diagnose this pathology non-invasively. However, the interpretation of the wave I amplitude in humans remains controversial. Recent studies in mice have established a robust and reliable mathematic algorithm, i.e., curve curvature quantification, for detecting cochlear synaptopathy. This study aimed to determine whether the curve curvature has sufficient test-retest reliability to detect cochlear synaptopathy in aging humans.
methodsHealthy participants were recruited into this prospective study. All subjects underwent an audiogram examination with standard and extended high frequencies ranging from 0.125 to 16 kHz and an ABR with a stimulus of 80 dB nHL click. The peak amplitude, peak latency, curvature at the peak, and the area under the curve of wave I were calculated and analyzed.
resultsA total of 80 individuals with normal hearing, aged 18 to 61 years, participated in this study, with a mean age of 26.4 years. Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant negative correlation between curvature and age, as well as between curvature and extended high frequency (EHF) threshold (10-16 kHz). Additionally, the same correlation was observed between age and area as well as age and EHF threshold. The model comparison demonstrated that the curvature at the peak of wave I is the best metric to correlate with EHF threshold.
conclusionThe curvature at the peak of wave I is the most sensitive metric for detecting cochlear synaptopathy in humans and may be applied in routine diagnostics to detect early degenerations of the auditory nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38703194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.