ArticleBrain and behavior2024
Impaired sequence manipulation in non-demented patients with progressive supranuclear palsy.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impaired Sequential Working Memory in Patients With Young Onset Parkinson's Disease.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Impaired sequence manipulation in non-demented patients with progressive supranuclear palsy.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSequential working memory is the ability to maintain and manipulate sequential information at a second time scale. Patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or Parkinson's disease (PD) perform poorly in tests that require the flexible arrangement of thoughts or actions. This study investigated whether sequential working memory is differently impaired in patients with PSP versus PD.
methodTwenty-nine patients with PSP Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS), 36 patients with PD, and 36 healthy controls (HC) completed 3 well-established neuropsychological tests, including digit span forward (DST-F), digit span backward (DST-B), and adaptive digit ordering tests (DOT-A). The DST-F required maintaining digit sequences, and the DST-B and DOT-A required maintaining and manipulating digit sequences. FINDING: The PSP-RS group scored lower than the PD and HC groups in the DST-B and DOT-A but not in the DST-F, indicating that the ability to manipulate sequences was impaired, but the maintenance ability was preserved in PSP-RS patients. Moreover, in PSP-RS, the DST-B score negatively correlated with the severity of motor symptoms. The actual levodopa dose positively correlated with the DST-B ordering cost (DST-F score vs. DST-B score). The PSP patients who took a greater dose of levodopa tended to have higher DST-B ordering cost. There was no effect of levodopa on DST-B or DOT-A in PD.
conclusionThese results suggested that the ability to manipulate sequence was already reduced in patients with PSP-RS and was worse than in patients with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.