ArticleInternational journal of dermatology2024
Risk and timing of isotretinoin-related laboratory disturbances: a population-based study.
Article in International journal of dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of isotretinoin and omega-3 fatty acid combination on lipid metabolism in patients with acne vulgaris: a randomized controlled trial.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Trial
- Pemphigus Is not Associated with an Increased Risk of Psychiatric Disorders during the Course of the Disease.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Article
- PRACT-India: Practical Recommendations on Acne Care and Medical Treatment in India-A Modified Delphi Consensus.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Compliance with the European Pregnancy Prevention Programme in Isotretinoin Treatment: Safety Outcomes and Dose-Related Correlations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Electrocardiogram abnormalities in patients with acne undergoing isotretinoin therapy: a focused review.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUncertainty surrounds the optimal routine laboratory monitoring in acne patients treated with isotretinoin.
objectiveOur aim was to evaluate the risk of mild and severe laboratory abnormalities in patients with acne starting isotretinoin versus oral antibiotic treatment.
methodsA global population-based retrospective cohort study assigned two groups of patients with acne-prescribed isotretinoin (n = 79,012) and oral antibiotics (n = 79,012). Comprehensive propensity-score matching was conducted.
resultsCompared to acne patients treated with oral antibiotics, those under isotretinoin demonstrated an increased risk of grade ≥3 hypertriglyceridemia (hazard ratio [HR], 7.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.58-11.05; P < 0.001) and grade ≥3 elevated aspartate transaminase (AST) levels (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.85; P = 0.003) within the initial 3 months of treatment. The absolute risk of these abnormalities among isotretinoin initiators was 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively. The risk difference of these findings was clinically marginal: 3 and 1 additional cases per 1,000 patients starting isotretinoin, respectively. There was no significant risk of grade ≥3 impairment in cholesterol, alanine transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, or creatinine levels under isotretinoin. Most laboratory abnormalities were documented 1-3 months after drug initiation in time-stratified analysis.
conclusionIsotretinoin is associated with a clinically marginal increased risk of severe hypertriglyceridemia and hypertransaminasemia. Routine blood testing should be performed 1-3 months after commencing therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.