Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702835›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2024

Chlorhexidine is not effective at any concentration in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Alessandro De Cassai, Tommaso Pettenuzzo, Veronica Busetto, Christian Legnaro, Chiara Pretto, Alessio Rotondi, Annalisa Boscolo, Nicolò Sella, Marina Munari, Paolo Navalesi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandro De CassaiSant'Antonio Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy. alessandro.decassai@gmail.com.
Tommaso PettenuzzoUOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Veronica BusettoCardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Christian LegnaroDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Chiara PrettoDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Alessio RotondiDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Annalisa BoscoloUOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Nicolò SellaUOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Marina MunariSant'Antonio Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiUOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral chlorhexidine has been widely used for ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention in the critical care setting; however, previous studies and evidence synthesis have generated inconsistent findings. Our study aims to investigate if different concentrations of oral chlorhexidine may be effective in preventing such complication in intensive care unit patients.

methodsAfter pre-registration (Open Science Framework: 8CUKF), we conducted a network meta-analysis with the following PICOS: adult patients (age > 18 years old) undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation admitted in ICU (P); any concentration of chlorhexidine used for oral hygiene (I); placebo, sham intervention, usual care, or no intervention (C); rate of VAP (primary outcome), mechanical ventilation length, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, mortality (secondary outcomes) (O); randomized controlled trials (S). We used the following database: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and EMBASE without any limitation in publication date or language.

resultsChlorhexidine did not demonstrate any significant advantage over the control group in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia or reducing mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, or overall mortality.

conclusionsChlorhexidine oral decontamination does not reduce the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill adult patients and its routine use could not be recommended.

trial registrationRegistration number: Open Science Framework: 8CUKF.

Indexed as

ChlorhexidineCritical careMechanical ventilationMeta-analysisVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID38702835
PMCPMC11067293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.