ArticleBMC health services research2024
Project ECHO
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Can Project ECHO Be Implemented in Lebanon to Increase Cancer Patient Access to Care in Rural Areas?Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- "Building the boat while sailing" - adapting towards telementoring literacy.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Sanitation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Healthcare system complexity of hepatitis B and C related liver disease: service mapping in New South Wales, Australia.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing the Project ECHO model: perspectives of 8 ECHO implementation teams.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Exploring the Implementation of Multiple Telementoring ECHO Programs From an Institutional and Organizational Perspective: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Adoption and Implementation of Affordable Cancer Technologies in El Salvador: Identifying Implementation Strategies for Successful Cervical Cancer Prevention in Resource-Limited Settings.JCO global oncology · 2025Review
- Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain and substance use disorders.Current opinion in psychology · 2025Review
- Interprofessional Discussion for Knowledge Transfer in a Digital "Community of Practice" for Managing Pneumoconiosis: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Strengthening Primary Care Through Project ECHOJournal of primary care & community healthArticle
- A Quantitative Approach to Data Collection and Analysis of ECHO Programs Focused on Cancer Care.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrganizations implement innovations to disrupt the status quo and create value. Within sectors such as healthcare, innovations need to navigate large scale system and organizational factors to succeed. This research explores the implementation of a global innovation- Project ECHO
methodsAn empirical study was conducted to collect data on 54 Project ECHO
resultsThe 54 implementation success indicators measured in this survey revealed that the adoption of Project ECHO
conclusionsThese findings make a valuable contribution to address a knowledge gap regarding how a global sample of organizations adopting Project ECHO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.