Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702657›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Exploring the Quality of Life (QOL) of medical students in Karachi, Pakistan.

Makhdoom Bilawal, Ramna Shafique, Rafay Shahab Ansari, Muhammad Arsalan Bashir, Muhammad Amaan Nadeem, Sardar Noman Qayyum, Hussain Haider Shah, Annoushay Tehseen, Lujain Alnemr, Samim Noori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Makhdoom BilawalZiauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ramna ShafiqueZiauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rafay Shahab AnsariZiauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Arsalan BashirIndus Hospital & Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Amaan NadeemZiauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sardar Noman QayyumBacha Khan Medical College, Mardan, Pakistan.
Hussain Haider ShahDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Annoushay TehseenRawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Lujain AlnemrUniversity of Health Sciences - Hamidiye International School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Samim NooriNangarhar University Faculty of Medicine, Nangarhar, Afghanistan. sameemnoori@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7195-2010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pursuit of medical and dental education is challenging and can affect the overall quality of life of medical students. Assessing the quality of life of medical students is the first step in the preparation of efficient future health care professionals. This study used the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) to evaluate the quality of life of medical and dental students in Karachi, Pakistan.

objectivesThe study objectives include: assessing the QoL of medical and dental students and their general health satisfaction and self-satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among 344 medical and dental students from different medical and dental schools in Karachi, Pakistan. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire was used to assess QOL, which included 26 items covering four domains: physical, psychological, social, and environmental. All scores for the domains ranged from 4 to 20. Scoring was done according to the WHOQOL-BREF procedure manual. The questionnaire was disseminated to medical students using Google Forms. SPSS software was used to analyze the data. Cronbach's alpha and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test were used to evaluate the reliability and sampling adequacy of the data for factor analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed for each variable and QoL domain, including frequencies, percentages, averages, and standard deviations. Domain scores were compared using a t-test and one-way ANOVA, with p-values less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance.

resultsAmong the 344 medical students, 56.7% (n = 195) were female and 43.3% (n = 149) were male. The WHOQOL-BREF demonstrated excellent reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.918. Most medical students rated their overall QOL (62.2%) and health satisfaction (46.8%) as good, and were able to get around well (71.3%). No significant sex differences were found across the various QOL domains. Marital status significantly affected QOL scores (p < 0.005). Single students had significantly higher QOL scores than married/separated/divorced students did. Overall, the environmental domain had the highest mean score (26.81 ± 6.17), while social relationships had the lowest mean score (9.68 ± 2.93).

conclusionThe findings of this study provide valuable insights into the QoL of medical and dental students. Most participants reported moderate satisfaction with their physical health and lower satisfaction with the psychological, social, and environmental components of QoL. Marital status was found to significantly impact the QoL as compared to single students with greater QoL. These findings can help form targeted interventions to enhance medical students' quality of life and prepare efficient future healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStudents, DentalStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePakistanPersonal SatisfactionReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBurnoutDental educationMedical educationMedical studentsQuality of lifeWell-being

Identifiers

PMID38702657
PMCPMC11069173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.