ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024
Airway management and pulmonary aspiration during surgical interventions in pregnant women in the 2nd/3rd trimester and immediate postpartum - a retrospective study in a tertiary care university hospital.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07742748 (Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Carbohydrate-Optimized Nutritional Solution Versus Electrolyte Hydration in Active Labor With Epidural Analgesia in Low-Risk Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Carbohydrate-Optimized Nutritional Solution Versus Electrolyte Hydration in Active Labor With Epidural Analgesia in Low-Risk Pregnant Women
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term corticosteroid therapy in aspiration pneumonitis complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome: A case report.Medicine · 2026Article
- Airway management in the obstetric patient: management strategyRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2026Review
- Transnasopharyngeal positive pressure ventilation during balloon dilation of severe subglottic stenosis in a low-weight infant: a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Anesthetic Management of the Pregnant Patient Undergoing Non-Obstetric Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study.NIHR open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnancy is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration during general anaesthesia, but the incidence of this complication is not well defined.
methodsWe performed a retrospective database review in a tertiary care university hospital to determine the incidence of pulmonary aspiration in pregnant patients undergoing endotracheal intubation, with and without Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI), as well as face-mask ventilation and supraglottic airway devices. We included Patients in the 2
resultsData from 2,390 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for cerclage of cervix uteri, manual removal of retained placenta, repair of obstetric laceration, or postpartum bleeding were retrospectively evaluated. A supraglottic airway device or face-mask ventilation was used in 1,425/2,390 (60%) of patients, while 638/2,390 (27%) were intubated. RSI was used in 522/638 (82%) of patients undergoing tracheal intubation, or 522/2,390 (22%) of the entire cohort. In-depth review of the charts, including 54 patients who had been initially classified as "possible pulmonary aspiration" by anaesthetists, revealed that this adverse event did not occur in the cohort.
conclusionsIn conclusion, in this obstetric surgery patient population at risk for pulmonary aspiration, supraglottic airway devices were used in approximately 60% of cases. Yet, no aspiration event was detected with either a supraglottic airway or endotracheal intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.