Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702613›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Structural- and DTI- MRI enable automated prediction of IDH Mutation Status in CNS WHO Grade 2-4 glioma patients: a deep Radiomics Approach.

Jialin Yuan, Loizos Siakallis, Hongwei Bran Li, Sebastian Brandner, Jianguo Zhang, Chenming Li, Laura Mancini, Sotirios Bisdas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jialin YuanDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Loizos SiakallisQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Hongwei Bran LiDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian BrandnerDivision of Neuropathology, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Jianguo ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Chenming LiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Laura ManciniQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Sotirios BisdasQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. s.bisdas@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Guangdong Medical Research Foundation A2024506the National Institute for Health Research to UCLH Biomedical Research Centre BRC399/NS/RB/101410the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62276121the Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Committee GJHZ20220913142613025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status for glioma stratification and prognosis is established. While structural magnetic resonance image (MRI) is a promising biomarker, it may not be sufficient for non-invasive characterisation of IDH mutation status. We investigated the diagnostic value of combined diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and structural MRI enhanced by a deep radiomics approach based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and support vector machine (SVM), to determine the IDH mutation status in Central Nervous System World Health Organization (CNS WHO) grade 2-4 gliomas.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed the DTI-derived fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) images and structural images including fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), non-enhanced T1-, and T2-weighted images of 206 treatment-naïve gliomas, including 146 IDH mutant and 60 IDH-wildtype ones. The lesions were manually segmented by experienced neuroradiologists and the masks were applied to the FA and MD maps. Deep radiomics features were extracted from each subject by applying a pre-trained CNN and statistical description. An SVM classifier was applied to predict IDH status using imaging features in combination with demographic data.

resultsWe comparatively assessed the CNN-SVM classifier performance in predicting IDH mutation status using standalone and combined structural and DTI-based imaging features. Combined imaging features surpassed stand-alone modalities for the prediction of IDH mutation status [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.846; sensitivity = 0.925; and specificity = 0.567]. Importantly, optimal model performance was noted following the addition of demographic data (patients' age) to structural and DTI imaging features [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.847; sensitivity = 0.911; and specificity = 0.617].

conclusionsImaging features derived from DTI-based FA and MD maps combined with structural MRI, have superior diagnostic value to that provided by standalone structural or DTI sequences. In combination with demographic information, this CNN-SVM model offers a further enhanced non-invasive prediction of IDH mutation status in gliomas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingGliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeural Networks, ComputerRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseCNNDeep neural networkDTIIDHMutation statusPredictionSupervised learningSVM

Identifiers

PMID38702613
PMCPMC11067215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.