Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702479›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenia in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Min Kyeong Jang, Sungwon Park, Rebecca Raszewski, Chang Gi Park, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Sue Kim

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exercise as a modulator of purinergic signaling and inflammation in cancer-associated sarcopenia: a narrative review.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min Kyeong JangMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Nursing, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea. researchmkj0601@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6073-161X
Sungwon ParkDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rebecca RaszewskiLibrary of the Health Sciences-Chicago, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Chang Gi ParkDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ardith Z DoorenbosDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sue KimMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Nursing, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea grant 2021R1C1C2004628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe impact of sarcopenia in oncology is increasingly recognized, yet little is known about its clinical implications in breast cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimates the overall prevalence of sarcopenia in breast cancer, quantifies skeletal muscle index (SMI), and comprehensively evaluates sarcopenia's impact on clinical outcomes.

methodsWe systematically searched primary original research published before June 2023 in four databases: the Cochrane Library via Wiley, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Embase via Elsevier Excerpta Medica, and Medline via Ovid. Standardized mean SMI and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by applying the random-effects model. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment checklist.

resultsThe systematic review included 17 studies with a total of 9863 patients; the meta-analysis included 12 of these studies. The mean prevalence of sarcopenia in breast cancer (stages I-III) was 32.5%. The mean SMI assessed by CT was 43.94 cm

conclusionSarcopenia is not just a state of muscle mass loss, but an influencing factor on therapeutic effects and survival rates in oncology. It is thus necessary to recognize the risk of sarcopenia throughout the trajectory of cancer treatment, identify low muscle mass early, and manage it from a prehabilitation perspective.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSarcopeniaFemaleHumansPrevalenceBody compositionBreast neoplasmsMuscle massReviewSarcopenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.