Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702358›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Multi-objective optimization of wire electrical discharge machining process using multi-attribute decision making techniques and regression analysis.

Masoud Seidi, Saeed Yaghoubi, Farshad Rabiei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masoud SeidiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
Saeed YaghoubiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. S.yaghoubi@ilam.ac.ir.
Farshad RabieiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. F.rabiei@ilam.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) is one of the most important non-traditional machining methods that is widely used in various industries. The present research work is concerned with the influences of process variables on quality of machined specimen obtained from WEDM process. The process parameters to manufacture mold structure included wire feed speed, wire tension and generator power, and in the current research, the effects of these variables on the aim factors, namely dimensional accuracy, hardness and roughness of product surface have been investigated, simultaneously. In order to obtain the optimal experiment, the multi-objective optimization with discrete solution area has been employed. Method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) and weighted aggregates sum product assessment (WASPAS) techniques have been used with the aim of weighting the objective functions and discovering the best practical experiment. In the following, the regression analysis has been employed to study the effects of variables on response factors. A good correlation between the results gained from two analysis methods was observed. Based on MEREC-WASPAS hybrid technique, the weights of roughness, hardness and dimensional accuracy of machined part were calculated to about 89%, 9% and 2%, respectively. In the selected optimal experiment, the amount of wire feed speed, wire tension and generator power variables were considered to, in turn, 2 cm/s, 2.5 kg, and 10%.

Indexed as

Dimensional accuracyElectrical discharge machiningHardnessMethod based on the removal effects of criteriaRoughnessWeighted aggregates sum product assessment

Identifiers

PMID38702358
PMCPMC11068730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.