Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702351›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Changes of PK/PD of Meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock and exploration of clinical rational administration plan: a prospective exploratory study.

Youquan Wang, Hongxiang Li, Dongxia Wang, Yuting Li, Yangyang Shen, Yao Fu, Yanhua Li, Meng Gao, Dong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Youquan WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Hongxiang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Dongxia WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Yuting LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Yangyang ShenYantai Yeda Hospital, Shandong, China.
Yao FuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Yanhua LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Meng GaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Dong ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chaoyang District, Changchun City, 130021, Jilin Province, China. zhangdong@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

Wu Jiping Medical Foundation 320.6750.19089.30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the changes of pharmacokinetic parameters after meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock after gastrointestinal perforation, and to simulate the probability of different dosing regimens achieving different pharmacodynamic goals. The study included 12 patients, and utilized high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to monitor the plasma concentration of meropenem. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and %fT > 4MIC was compared among simulated dosing regimens. The results showed that in 96 blood samples from 12 patients, the clearance (CL) of meropenem in the normal and abnormal creatinine clearance subgroups were 7.7 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 1.1 L/h, respectively, and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) was 22.6 ± 5.1 and 17.2 ± 5.8 L, respectively. 2. Regardless of the subgroup, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h regimen achieved a PTA > 90% when MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L. 1.0 g/q6h infusion regimen compared with other regimen, in most cases, the probability of making PTA > 90% is higher. For patients at low MIC, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. For patients at high MIC, a dose regimen of 1.0 g/q6 h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. Further research is needed to confirm this exploratory result.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsShock, SepticAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntestinal PerforationMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemIntensive careMeropenemMonte Carlo simulationPharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamicsSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID38702351
PMCPMC11068909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.