ArticleScientific reports2024
Changes of PK/PD of Meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock and exploration of clinical rational administration plan: a prospective exploratory study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Optimization and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Abdominal Sepsis: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Clinical Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pyridoxic Acid as a Novel Endogenous Biomarker for OAT-Mediated Clearance of Meropenem: A Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and PK/PD-Response Analysis in Patients with Sepsis.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for individualised meropenem dosing in CRRT patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Meropenem Use and Challenges in Treating Severe Infections in Pakistan Amid Antimicrobial Resistance.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Variability in Meropenem Distribution and Clearance in Children with Sepsis: Population-Based Pharmacokinetics with Assessment of Renal Biomarkers.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Article
- Precision Dosing of Meropenem in Adults with Normal Renal Function: Insights from a Population Pharmacokinetic and Monte Carlo Simulation Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the changes of pharmacokinetic parameters after meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock after gastrointestinal perforation, and to simulate the probability of different dosing regimens achieving different pharmacodynamic goals. The study included 12 patients, and utilized high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to monitor the plasma concentration of meropenem. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and %fT > 4MIC was compared among simulated dosing regimens. The results showed that in 96 blood samples from 12 patients, the clearance (CL) of meropenem in the normal and abnormal creatinine clearance subgroups were 7.7 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 1.1 L/h, respectively, and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) was 22.6 ± 5.1 and 17.2 ± 5.8 L, respectively. 2. Regardless of the subgroup, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h regimen achieved a PTA > 90% when MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L. 1.0 g/q6h infusion regimen compared with other regimen, in most cases, the probability of making PTA > 90% is higher. For patients at low MIC, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. For patients at high MIC, a dose regimen of 1.0 g/q6 h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. Further research is needed to confirm this exploratory result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.