ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024
Microbubble-enhanced transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound brain hyperthermia: heating mechanism investigation using finite element method.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of transcranial focused ultrasound for primary brain tumors.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Neurological Disorders.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-mediated targeted micro/nanobubbles: breaking new boundaries in precision tumor therapy.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, our group developed a synergistic brain drug delivery method to achieve simultaneous transcranial hyperthermia and localized blood-brain barrier opening via MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS). In a rodent model, we demonstrated that the ultrasound power required for transcranial MRgFUS hyperthermia was significantly reduced by injecting microbubbles (MBs). However, the specific mechanisms underlying the power reduction caused by MBs remain unclear. The present study aims to elucidate the mechanisms of MB-enhanced transcranial MRgFUS hyperthermia through numerical studies using the finite element method. The microbubble acoustic emission (MAE) and the viscous dissipation (VD) were hypothesized to be the specific mechanisms. Acoustic wave propagation was used to model the FUS propagation in the brain tissue, and a bubble dynamics equation for describing the dynamics of MBs with small shell thickness was used to model the MB oscillation under FUS exposures. A modified bioheat transfer equation was used to model the temperature in the rodent brain with different heat sources. A theoretical model was used to estimate the bubble shell's surface tension, elasticity, and viscosity losses. The simulation reveals that MAE and VD caused a 40.5% and 52.3% additional temperature rise, respectively. Compared with FUS only, MBs caused a 64.0% temperature increase, which is consistent with our previous animal experiments. Our investigation showed that MAE and VD are the main mechanisms of MB-enhanced transcranial MRgFUS hyperthermia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.