Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702066›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Implementation of a Survey Spine MR Imaging Protocol for Cord Compression in the Emergency Department: Experience at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Mercy H Mazurek, Annie R Abruzzo, Alexander H King, Erica Koranteng, Grant Rigney, Winston Lie, Shahaan Razak, Rajiv Gupta, William A Mehan, Michael H Lev and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mercy H MazurekFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
Annie R AbruzzoFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
Alexander H KingFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-3102-4657
Erica KorantengFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
Grant RigneyFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-6849-5623
Winston LieFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
Shahaan RazakFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-1607-5309
Rajiv GuptaFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
William A MehanFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael H LevFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0236-7319
Joshua A HirschFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9594-8798
Karen BuchFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-8921
Marc D SucciFrom the Harvard Medical School (M.H.M., A.R.A., A.H.K., E.K., G.R., W.L., S.R., R.G., W.A.M., M.H.L., J.A.H., K.B., M.D.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-1518-3984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeImaging stewardship in the emergency department (ED) is vital in ensuring patients receive optimized care. While suspected cord compression (CC) is a frequent indication for total spine MR imaging in the ED, the incidence of CC is low. Recently, our level 1 trauma center introduced a survey spine MR imaging protocol to evaluate for suspected CC while reducing examination time to avoid imaging overutilization. This study aims to evaluate the time savings, frequency of ordering patterns of the survey, and the symptoms and outcomes of patients undergoing the survey. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study examined patients who received a survey spine MR imaging in the ED at our institution between 2018 and 2022. All examinations were performed on a 1.5T GE Healthcare scanner by using our institutional CC survey protocol, which includes sagittal T2WI and STIR sequences through the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Examinations were read by a blinded, board-certified neuroradiologist.

resultsA total of 2002 patients received a survey spine MR imaging protocol during the study period. Of these patients, 845 (42.2%, mean age 57 ± 19 years, 45% women) received survey spine MR imaging examinations for the suspicion of CC, and 120 patients (14.2% positivity rate) had radiographic CC. The survey spine MR imaging averaged 5 minutes and 50 seconds (79% faster than routine MR imaging). On multivariate analysis, trauma, back pain, lower extremity weakness, urinary or bowel incontinence, numbness, ataxia, and hyperreflexia were each independently associated with CC. Of the 120 patients with CC, 71 underwent emergent surgery, 20 underwent nonemergent surgery, and 29 were managed medically.

conclusionsThe survey spine protocol was positive for CC in 14% of patients in our cohort and acquired at a 79% faster rate compared with routine total spine. Understanding the positivity rate of CC, the clinical symptoms that are most associated with CC, and the subsequent care management for patients presenting with suspected cord compression who received the survey spine MR imaging may better inform the broad adoption and subsequent utilization of survey imaging protocols in emergency settings to increase throughput, improve allocation of resources, and provide efficient care for patients with suspected CC.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal Cord CompressionTrauma CentersAdultAgedClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38702066
PMCPMC11392377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.