Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38702056›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2024

'ThinkCancer!': randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention.

Stefanie Lj Disbeschl, Annie K Hendry, Alun Surgey, Daniel Walker, Nia Goulden, Bethany F Anthony, Richard Neal, Nefyn H Williams, Zoë Susannah Jane Hoare, Julia Hiscock and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Educational Interventions to Reduce Cancer Diagnostic Delays in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stefanie Lj DisbeschlNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6058-519X
Annie K HendryNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-1368
Alun SurgeyNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6019-7787
Daniel WalkerNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.
Nia GouldenNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health and Social Care (NWORTH CTU), Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-3987
Bethany F AnthonyCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2593-1069
Richard NealDepartment of Health and Community Sciences, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3544-2744
Nefyn H WilliamsDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8078-409X
Zoë Susannah Jane HoareNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health and Social Care (NWORTH CTU), Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1803-5482
Julia HiscockNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-2981
Rhiannon Tudor Rt EdwardsCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4748-5730
Ruth LewisNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0745-995X
Clare WilkinsonNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK c.wilkinson@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0378-8078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUK cancer deaths remain high; primary care is key for earlier cancer diagnosis as half of avoidable delays occur here. Improvement is possible through lower referral thresholds, better guideline adherence, and better safety-netting systems. Few interventions target whole practice teams. We developed a novel whole-practice team intervention to address this.

aimTo test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, complex behavioural intervention, 'ThinkCancer!', for assessment in a subsequent Phase III trial. DESIGN &

settingPragmatic, superiority pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis in Welsh general practices.

methodClinical outcome data were collected from practices (the unit of randomisation). Practice characteristics and cancer safety-netting systems were assessed. Individual practice staff completed evaluation and feedback forms and qualitative interviews. The intervention was adapted and refined.

resultsTrial recruitment and workshop deliveries took place between March 2020 and May 2021. Trial progression criteria for recruitment, intervention fidelity, and routine data collection were met. Staff-level fidelity, retention, and individual level data collection processes were reviewed and amended. Interviews highlighted positive participant views on all aspects of the intervention. All practices set out to liberalise referral thresholds appropriately, implement guidelines, and address safety-netting plans in detail.

conclusion'ThinkCancer!' appears feasible and acceptable. The new iteration of the workshops was completed and the Phase III trial has been funded to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this novel professional behaviour change intervention. Delivery at scale to multiple practices will likely improve fidelity and reach.

Indexed as

CancerDiagnosisFeasibility studiesGeneral practitionersPractice-basedPrimary healthcareRandomized controlled trialThink Cancer

Identifiers

PMID38702056
PMCPMC11523528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.