Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38701440›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Assessing the Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Web-Based Self-Management Program for Chronic Noncancer Pain: Mixed Methods Study.

Pascale Marier-Deschenes, Anne Marie Pinard, Laura Jalbert, Annie LeBlanc

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05319652 (Co-development and Assessment of the Feasibility and Potential Effects of an Online Self-management Program for Chronic Non-cancer Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05319652 nacompletednot on this map

Co-development and Assessment of the Feasibility and Potential Effects of an Online Self-management Program for Chronic Non-cancer Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled63ConditionsChronic PainArmsPain self-management program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pascale Marier-DeschenesLaval University, Medicine Faculty, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5829-5620
Anne Marie PinardLaval University, Medicine Faculty, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7014-9359
Laura JalbertVITAM, Centre de recherche en santé durable, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-7454
Annie LeBlancLaval University, Medicine Faculty, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-8102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, adults with chronic noncancer pain face a persistent insufficiency of publicly funded resources, with the gold standard multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities unable to meet the high clinical demand. Web-based self-management programs cost-effectively increase access to pain management and can improve several aspects of physical and emotional functioning. Aiming to meet the demand for accessible, fully automated resources for individuals with chronic noncancer pain, we developed a French web- and evidence-based self-management program, Agir pour moi (APM). This program includes pain education and strategies to reduce stress, practice mindfulness, apply pacing, engage in physical activity, identify and manage thinking traps, sleep better, adapt diet, and sustain behavior change.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the APM self-management program's feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects in adults awaiting specialized services from a center of expertise in chronic pain management.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study with an explanatory sequential design, including a web-based 1-arm trial and qualitative semistructured interviews. We present the results from both phases through integrative tables called joint displays.

resultsResponse rates were 70% (44/63) at postintervention and 56% (35/63) at 3-month follow-up among the 63 consenting participants who provided self-assessed information at baseline. In total, 46% (29/63) of the participants completed the program. We interviewed 24% (15/63) of the participants. The interview's first theme revolved around the overall acceptance, user-friendliness, and engaging nature of the program. The second theme emphasized the differentiation between microlevel and macrolevel engagements. The third theme delved into the diverse effects observed, potentially influenced by the macrolevel engagements. Participants highlighted the features that impacted their self-efficacy and the adoption of self-management strategies. We observed indications of improvement in self-efficacy, pain intensity, pain interference, depression, and catastrophizing. Interviewees described these and various other effects as potentially influenced by macrolevel engagement through behavioral change.

conclusionsThese findings provided preliminary evidence that the APM self-management program and research methods are feasible. However, some participants expressed the need for at least phone reminders and minimal support from a professional available to answer questions over the first few weeks of the program to engage. Recruitment strategies of a future randomized controlled trial should focus on attracting a broader representation of individuals with chronic pain in terms of gender and ethnicity.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05319652; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05319652.

Indexed as

Chronic PainFeasibility StudiesPain ManagementSelf-ManagementAdultAgedCanadaFemaleHumansInternetInternet-Based InterventionMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchchronic paineHealthevidence basedmixed methods studypainpain educationpain treatmentpersistent painself-managementself-paced interventionweb basedweb-based program

Identifiers

PMID38701440
PMCPMC11102036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.