ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
TransAC4C-a novel interpretable architecture for multi-species identification of N4-acetylcytidine sites in RNA with single-base resolution.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ac4C modification sites prediction in human mRNA: a complete review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Review
- The NAT10/acCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Emerging roles of RNA N4-acetylcytidine modification in reproductive health.Protein & cell · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) is a modification found in ribonucleic acid (RNA) related to diseases. Expensive and labor-intensive methods hindered the exploration of ac4C mechanisms and the development of specific anti-ac4C drugs. Therefore, an advanced prediction model for ac4C in RNA is urgently needed. Despite the construction of various prediction models, several limitations exist: (1) insufficient resolution at base level for ac4C sites; (2) lack of information on species other than Homo sapiens; (3) lack of information on RNA other than mRNA; and (4) lack of interpretation for each prediction. In light of these limitations, we have reconstructed the previous benchmark dataset and introduced a new dataset including balanced RNA sequences from multiple species and RNA types, while also providing base-level resolution for ac4C sites. Additionally, we have proposed a novel transformer-based architecture and pipeline for predicting ac4C sites, allowing for highly accurate predictions, visually interpretable results and no restrictions on the length of input RNA sequences. Statistically, our work has improved the accuracy of predicting specific ac4C sites in multiple species from less than 40% to around 85%, achieving a high AUC > 0.9. These results significantly surpass the performance of all existing models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.