Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38700756›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2024

Development of algorithms for estimating the Child Health Utility 9D from Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disability.

Utsana Tonmukayakul, Kate Willoughby, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Dinah Reddihough, Brendan Mulhern, Rob Carter, Suzanne Robinson, Gang Chen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Utsana TonmukayakulDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. utsana.tonmukayakul@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6464-744X
Kate WilloughbyOrthopaedic Department, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-2820
Cathrine MihalopoulosDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-9462
Dinah ReddihoughMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3634-7906
Brendan MulhernCentre of Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Haymarket, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-8063
Rob CarterDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6393-4538
Suzanne RobinsonDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-6475
Gang ChenCentre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-5965

Funding

NHMRC APP1057997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary aim was to determine Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) utilities from the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD) for non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP).

methodsOne hundred and eight surveys completed by Australian parents/caregivers of children with CP were analysed. Spearman's coefficients were used to investigate the correlations between the two instruments. Ordinary least square, robust MM-estimator, and generalised linear models (GLM) with four combinations of families and links were developed to estimate CHU9D utilities from either the CPCHILD total score or CPCHILD domains scores. Internal validation was performed using 5-fold cross-validation and random sampling validation. The best performing algorithms were identified based on mean absolute error (MAE), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and the difference between predicted and observed means of CHU9D.

resultsModerate correlations (ρ 0.4-0.6) were observed between domains of the CHU9D and CPCHILD instruments. The best performing algorithm when considering the CPCHILD total score was a generalised linear regression (GLM) Gamma family and logit link (MAE = 0.156, CCC = 0.508). Additionally, the GLM Gamma family logit link using CPCHILD comfort and emotion, quality of life, and health domain scores also performed well (MAE = 0.152, CCC = 0.552).

conclusionThis study established algorithms for estimating CHU9D utilities from CPCHILD scores for non-ambulatory children with CP. The determined algorithms can be valuable for estimating quality-adjusted life years for cost-utility analysis when only the CPCHILD instrument is available. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and external validation are recommended to validate these findings.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCaregiversCerebral PalsyChildren with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeAdolescentAustraliaChildChild HealthChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth StatusHumansMalePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesCerebral palsyCHU9DCPCHILDMappingNon-ambulatory childrenQuality-adjusted life yearsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38700756
PMCPMC11176203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.