Trial reportThe Journal of urology2024
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cxbladder Triage to Cystoscopy in Patients With Microhematuria: The Safe Testing of Risk for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Trial.
Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large multicenter validation of urine RNA profile for urothelial carcinoma detection and surveillance.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Trial
- Circulating Tumor Function: A Systems Biology Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Genitourinary Cancers.Genes · 2026Review
- Integrating clinically actionable biomarkers into bladder cancer care - recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- A multi-modal approach for decision making in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Detection of bladder cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria using Oncuria-Detect: results of a prospective, multicenter international study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Real-World Utility of Cxbladder Triage for Patients with Microhematuria: A Matched Cohort Study.Urology practice · 2026Article
- Advancing bladder cancer detection: commentary on a urinary DNA methylation diagnostic assay.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- EarlyTect BCD Plus: A urine-based dual site PENK methylation test for risk-based cystoscopy triage in haematuria.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Development and prospective validation of a multitarget urine RNA assay for noninvasive detection of urothelial carcinoma.iScience · 2025Article
- Review
- Analytical Validation of the CxbladderDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Cost-Effective Strategies for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Diagnosis: A Risk-Based Alternative to the American Urological Association Guidelines.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Current perspectives of urine-based tests for screening and post-treatment monitoring of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Validation of CxbladderResearch and reports in urology · 2025Article
- Do All Low Risk Microhematuria Patients Require Cystoscopy?Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAUA guidelines for patients with microhematuria (≥3 red blood cells [RBC]/high-power field [hpf]) include cystoscopy for most over age 40 due to risk of urothelial cancer (UC). Cxbladder Triage (CxbT) is a urinary genomic test with UC negative predictive value of 99%. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared cystoscopy use in a standard of care (SOC) arm vs a marker-based approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll patients with hematuria provided urine for a CxbT. Those categorized as lower risk (LR), defined as 3 to 29 RBC/hpf and minimal smoking history (<10 pack-years) were randomized between the test group provided with the CxbT result vs the SOC control group. Negative CxbT patients were offered omission of cystoscopy with surveillance. "Not lower risk" (NLR) patients (>30 RBC/hpf or >10 pack-year smoking history) had a CxbT but otherwise SOC. Patient decision and outcomes were recorded.
resultsOf 390 eligible patients, 255 were NLR and 135 were LR randomized to CxbT informed decision or SOC. The median age was 62 years (range 18-94) and 54% were male. Overall, 63% of CxbT tests were negative. For NLR patients, 82% had cystoscopy. In the LR control group, cystoscopy was performed in 67% of SOC and 27% in the test group (relative risk 0.41 [95% CI 0.27-0.61]). Compared to cystoscopy, CxbT had 90% sensitivity, 56% specificity, and 99% negative predictive value for UC.
conclusionsIn this prospective randomized controlled trial, use of CxbT in patients with LR hematuria resulted in 59% reduction of cystoscopy use. This clinical utility of CxbT can reduce the burden of unnecessary cystoscopies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.