Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38700731›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2024

A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cxbladder Triage to Cystoscopy in Patients With Microhematuria: The Safe Testing of Risk for Asymptomatic Microhematuria Trial.

Yair Lotan, Siamak Daneshmand, Neal Shore, Peter Black, Kristen R Scarpato, Amit Patel, Tony Lough, Daniel A Shoskes, Jay D Raman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Analytical Validation of the CxbladderDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Validation of CxbladderResearch and reports in urology · 2025
    Article
  15. Do All Low Risk Microhematuria Patients Require Cystoscopy?Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas.
Siamak DaneshmandInstitute of Urology, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Los Angeles, California.
Neal ShoreCarolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
Peter BlackDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kristen R ScarpatoDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Amit PatelDepartment of Urology, DuPage Medical Group, Chicago, Illinois.
Tony LoughPacific Edge Ltd, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Daniel A ShoskesPacific Edge Diagnostics, Redwood City, California.
Jay D RamanDepartment of Urology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAUA guidelines for patients with microhematuria (≥3 red blood cells [RBC]/high-power field [hpf]) include cystoscopy for most over age 40 due to risk of urothelial cancer (UC). Cxbladder Triage (CxbT) is a urinary genomic test with UC negative predictive value of 99%. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared cystoscopy use in a standard of care (SOC) arm vs a marker-based approach. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients with hematuria provided urine for a CxbT. Those categorized as lower risk (LR), defined as 3 to 29 RBC/hpf and minimal smoking history (<10 pack-years) were randomized between the test group provided with the CxbT result vs the SOC control group. Negative CxbT patients were offered omission of cystoscopy with surveillance. "Not lower risk" (NLR) patients (>30 RBC/hpf or >10 pack-year smoking history) had a CxbT but otherwise SOC. Patient decision and outcomes were recorded.

resultsOf 390 eligible patients, 255 were NLR and 135 were LR randomized to CxbT informed decision or SOC. The median age was 62 years (range 18-94) and 54% were male. Overall, 63% of CxbT tests were negative. For NLR patients, 82% had cystoscopy. In the LR control group, cystoscopy was performed in 67% of SOC and 27% in the test group (relative risk 0.41 [95% CI 0.27-0.61]). Compared to cystoscopy, CxbT had 90% sensitivity, 56% specificity, and 99% negative predictive value for UC.

conclusionsIn this prospective randomized controlled trial, use of CxbT in patients with LR hematuria resulted in 59% reduction of cystoscopy use. This clinical utility of CxbT can reduce the burden of unnecessary cystoscopies.

Indexed as

CystoscopyHematuriaTriageUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedAsymptomatic DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Assessmentcontrolled clinical trialsgenomicshematuriarandomized

Identifiers

PMID38700731
PMCPMC12721662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.