Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38700668›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2024

Machine-Learning-Aided Understanding of Protein Adsorption on Zwitterionic Polymer Brushes.

Hiroto Okuyama, Yuuki Sugawara, Takeo Yamaguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hiroto OkuyamaLaboratory for Chemistry and Life Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-964X
Yuuki SugawaraLaboratory for Chemistry and Life Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2696-1833
Takeo YamaguchiLaboratory for Chemistry and Life Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9043-4408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constructing antifouling surfaces is a crucial technique for optimizing the performance of devices such as water treatment membranes and medical devices in practical environments. These surfaces are achieved by modification with hydrophilic polymers. Notably, zwitterionic (ZI) polymers have attracted considerable interest because of their ability to form a robust hydration layer and inhibit the adsorption of foulants. However, the importance of the molecular weight and density of the ZI polymer on the antifouling property is partially understood, and the surface design still retains an empirical flavor. Herein, we individually assessed the influence of the molecular weight and density of the ZI polymer on protein adsorption through machine learning. The results corroborated that protein adsorption is more strongly influenced by density than by molecular weight. Furthermore, the distribution of predicted protein adsorption against molecular weight and polymer density enabled us to determine conditions that enhanced (or weaken) antifouling. The relevance of this prediction method was also demonstrated by estimating the protein adsorption over a wide range of ionic strengths. Overall, this machine-learning-based approach is expected to contribute as a tool for the optimized functionalization of materials, extending beyond the applications of ZI polymer brushes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPolymersAdsorptionAnimalsBiofoulingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular WeightProteinsSurface PropertiesPolymersProteinsantifoulingmachine learningpolymer brushprotein adsorptionzwitterionic polymer

Identifiers

PMID38700668
PMCPMC11103666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.