ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024
Revisiting prognostic factors of gliomatosis cerebri in adult-type diffuse gliomas.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting prognosis of oligodendroglioma patients in the 2021 WHO classification: incremental value of imaging features.European radiology · 2026Article
- A Radiologist's Guide to IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma for Efficient Communication With Clinicians: Part I-Essential Information on Preoperative and Immediate Postoperative Imaging.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of molecular and histological glioblastomas: insights into prognostic variance.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is lack of comprehensive analysis evaluating the impact of clinical, molecular, imaging, and surgical data on survival of patients with gliomatosis cerebri (GC). This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors of GC in adult-type diffuse glioma patients.
methodsRetrospective chart and imaging review was performed in 99 GC patients from adult-type diffuse glioma (among 1,211 patients; 6 oligodendroglioma, 16 IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and 77 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma) from a single institution between 2005 and 2021. Predictors of overall survival (OS) of entire patients and IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients were determined.
resultsThe median OS was 16.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.2-22.2) in entire patients and 14.3 months (95% CI 12.2-61.9) in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. In entire patients, KPS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.98, P = 0.004), no 1p/19q codeletion (HR = 10.75, P = 0.019), MGMTp methylation (HR = 0.54, P = 0.028), and hemorrhage (HR = 3.45, P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors on multivariable analysis. In IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients, KPS (HR = 2.24, P = 0.075) was the only independent prognostic factor on multivariable analysis. In subgroup of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma with CE tumors, total resection of CE tumor did not remain as a significant prognostic factor (HR = 1.13, P = 0.685).
conclusionsThe prognosis of GC patients is determined by its underlying molecular type and patient performance status. Compared with diffuse glioma without GC, aggressive surgery of CE tumor in GC patients does not improve survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38700610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.