ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024
Artificial intelligence-based differential diagnosis of orbital MALT lymphoma and IgG4 related ophthalmic disease using hematoxylin-eosin images.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Transforming histologic assessment: artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and personalized treatment.British journal of cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Lymphoma Histopathology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in differentiating IgG4-related ophthalmic disease and orbital MALT lymphoma: a review of radiomics and deep learning advances.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Gene expression cluster differences and molecular correlation with the STING pathway in orbital MALT lymphoma and orbital IgG4-related eye disease.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the possibility of distinguishing between IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) and orbital MALT lymphoma using artificial intelligence (AI) and hematoxylin-eosin (HE) images.
methodsAfter identifying a total of 127 patients from whom we were able to procure tissue blocks with IgG4-ROD and orbital MALT lymphoma, we performed histological and molecular genetic analyses, such as gene rearrangement. Subsequently, pathological HE images were collected from these patients followed by the cutting out of 10 different image patches from the HE image of each patient. A total of 970 image patches from the 97 patients were used to construct nine different models of deep learning, and the 300 image patches from the remaining 30 patients were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the models. Area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used for the performance evaluation of the deep learning models. In addition, four ophthalmologists performed the binary classification between IgG4-ROD and orbital MALT lymphoma.
resultsEVA, which is a vision-centric foundation model to explore the limits of visual representation, was the best deep learning model among the nine models. The results of EVA were ACC = 73.3% and AUC = 0.807. The ACC of the four ophthalmologists ranged from 40 to 60%.
conclusionsIt was possible to construct an AI software based on deep learning that was able to distinguish between IgG4-ROD and orbital MALT. This AI model may be useful as an initial screening tool to direct further ancillary investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38700592What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.