Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38700543›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Complications After Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xue Zhang, Shuhua Ning, Yankun Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06830083 (Hypofractionated Radiation Fractionation in Breast Cancer Patients With Implant-Based Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06830083 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Hypofractionated Radiation Fractionation in Breast Cancer Patients With Implant-Based Reconstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2033Enrolled840ConditionsBreast CancerArmsHypofractionated Radiation Therapy, Conventional fraction radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xue ZhangDepartment of Dermatology and Aesthetic Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 5 Jingyuan Road, Beijing, China. Zhang_xue11@126.com.
Shuhua NingDepartment of Dermatology and Aesthetic Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 5 Jingyuan Road, Beijing, China.
Yankun ZhangDepartment of Dermatology and Aesthetic Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 5 Jingyuan Road, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes of immediate breast reconstructions can be influenced by postoperative radiotherapy. However, there is no clarity on the use of prepectoral or subpectoral breast reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). We reviewed evidence on the complication rates of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in women undergoing PMRT.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were scanned for studies comparing complication rates of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction with PMRT. All complications were pooled in a random-effect meta-analysis to obtain odds ratio (OR).

resultsEight observational studies were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of infections (OR: 1.22 95% CI 0.79, 1.88 I

conclusionsData from observational studies indicates that in appropriately selected patients there may not be any difference in the risk of early complications with prepectoral or subpectoral breast reconstruction with PMRT. Current evidence is limited by the small number of studies, short follow-up and selection bias. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing the two approaches to obtain robust evidence on long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyMastectomyPostoperative ComplicationsBreast ImplantationEstheticsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicPectoralis MusclesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerBreast implantInfectionMastectomyRadiotherapyTissue expander

Identifiers

PMID38700543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.