Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38700516›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2024

"Ectomycorrhizal exploration type" could be a functional trait explaining the spatial distribution of tree symbiotic fungi as a function of forest humus forms.

Khalfallah F, Bon L, El Mazlouzi M, Bakker M R, Fanin N, Bellanger R, Bernier F, De Schrijver A, Ducatillon C, Fotelli M N and 15 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Khalfallah FUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, F-54000, France.
Bon LINRAE, ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Villenave d'Ornon, F-33140, France.
El Mazlouzi MINRAE, ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Villenave d'Ornon, F-33140, France.
Bakker M RINRAE, ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Villenave d'Ornon, F-33140, France.
Fanin NINRAE, ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Villenave d'Ornon, F-33140, France.
Bellanger RINRAE, Site de la Villa Thuret, Antibes, 1353 UEVT, 06600, France.
Bernier FINRAE, Domaine de l'Hermitage, Cestas Pierroton, 0570 UEFP, 33610, France.
De Schrijver ADepartement Biowetenschappen en Industriële Technologie, AgroFoodNature HOGENT, Melle, 9090, Belgium.
Ducatillon CINRAE, Site de la Villa Thuret, Antibes, 1353 UEVT, 06600, France.
Fotelli M NForest Research Institute Hellenic Agricultural Organization Dimitra, Vassilika, Thessaloniki, 57006, Greece.
Gateble GINRAE, Site de la Villa Thuret, Antibes, 1353 UEVT, 06600, France.
Gundale M JDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 901-83, Sweden.
Larsson MDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 901-83, Sweden.
Legout AINRAE, BEF, Nancy, F-54000, France.
Mason W LForest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9SY, Scotland, UK.
Nordin ADepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 901-83, Sweden.
Smolander ANatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki, 00790, Finland.
Spyroglou GForest Research Institute Hellenic Agricultural Organization Dimitra, Vassilika, Thessaloniki, 57006, Greece.
Vanguelova E IForest Research, Alice Holt, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, GU10 4LH, UK.
Verheyen KForest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Gontrode, Melle, 9090, Belgium.
Vesterdal LDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, 1958, Denmark.
Zeller BINRAE, BEF, Nancy, F-54000, France.
Augusto LINRAE, ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Villenave d'Ornon, F-33140, France. laurent.augusto@inrae.fr.
Derrien DINRAE, BEF, Nancy, F-54000, France.
Buée MUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, F-54000, France. marc.buee@inrae.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche AAPG2019 CES32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In European forests, most tree species form symbioses with ectomycorrhizal (EM) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. The EM fungi are classified into different morphological types based on the development and structure of their extraradical mycelium. These structures could be root extensions that help trees to acquire nutrients. However, the relationship between these morphological traits and functions involved in soil nutrient foraging is still under debate.We described the composition of mycorrhizal fungal communities under 23 tree species in a wide range of climates and humus forms in Europe and investigated the exploratory types of EM fungi. We assessed the response of this tree extended phenotype to humus forms, as an indicator of the functioning and quality of forest soils. We found a significant relationship between the relative proportion of the two broad categories of EM exploration types (short- or long-distance) and the humus form, showing a greater proportion of long-distance types in the least dynamic soils. As past land-use and host tree species are significant factors structuring fungal communities, we showed this relationship was modulated by host trait (gymnosperms versus angiosperms), soil depth and past land use (farmland or forest).We propose that this potential functional trait of EM fungi be used in future studies to improve predictive models of forest soil functioning and tree adaptation to environmental nutrient conditions.

Indexed as

ForestsMycorrhizaeSoil MicrobiologySymbiosisTreesEuropeMycobiomeSoilSoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.