ArticleEuropean heart journal2024
Discordance among apoB, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides: implications for cardiovascular prevention.
Article in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Multiplex Apolipoprotein Panel Improves Cardiovascular Event Prediction and Cardiovascular Outcome by Identifying Patients Who Benefit From Targeted PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2025Trial
- Prevention of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease in tactical athletes.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Features of Lipid Disorders in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Top 10 Concepts in Secondary ASCVD Prevention From the 2026 ACC/AHA Dyslipidemia Guideline: What Is New and Why It Matters.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Risk-weighted apoB: a novel summary metric outperforming traditional lipid biomarkers in predicting coronary heart disease.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Association of the Discordance Between Apolipoprotein B and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol With Cognition.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Residual cardiovascular risk in coronary artery disease: from pathophysiology to established and novel therapies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- PCSK9 inhibitors do not increase cognitive risk.Biology direct · 2026Article
- B lymphocytes and hyperglycemia synergistically exacerbate coronary in-stent restenosis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of inclisiran versus evolocumab and alirocumab: a 180-day real-world study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Lipids and Lipoproteins and Their Relationship With Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective Study of UK Biobank Participants.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Importance and Management of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Dyslipidemia Treatment.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Progress in risk assessment and management: Forecasting updates across international cholesterol guidelines.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Review
- Association Between NHHR and Future Cardiovascular Disease Among Patients With CKM Stages 0-3: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Myocardial Infarction in an Ironman Triathlete: A Case for Advanced Lipid Testing in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.Cureus · 2026Article
- Association of apolipoprotein B and excess apolipoprotein B with cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Iron-lipid crosstalk in the progression from gestational diabetes to preeclampsia: proteomic discovery and targeted validation.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Is the Commitment to LDL-C Eternal?Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsDespite growing evidence that apolipoprotein B (apoB) is the most accurate marker of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, its adoption in clinical practice has been low. This investigation sought to determine whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides are sufficient for routine cardiovascular care.
methodsA sample of 293 876 UK Biobank adults (age: 40-73 years, 42% men), free of cardiovascular disease, with a median follow-up for new-onset ASCVD of 11 years was included. Distribution of apoB at pre-specified levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides was examined graphically, and 10-year ASCVD event rates were compared for high vs. low apoB. Residuals of apoB were constructed after regressing apoB on LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and log-transformed triglycerides and used as predictors in a proportional hazards regression model for new-onset ASCVD adjusted for standard risk factors, including HDL-C.
resultsApoB was highly correlated with LDL-C and non-HDL-C (Pearson's r = .96, P < .001 for both) but less so with log triglycerides (r = .42, P < .001). However, apoB ranges necessary to capture 95% of all observations at pre-specified levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, or triglycerides were wide, spanning 85.8-108.8 md/dL when LDL-C 130 mg/dL, 88.3-112.4 mg/dL when non-HDL-C 160 mg/dL, and 67.8-147.4 md/dL when triglycerides 115 mg/dL. At these levels (±10 mg/dL), 10-year ASCVD rates for apoB above mean + 1 SD vs. below mean - 1 SD were 7.3 vs. 4.0 for LDL-C, 6.4 vs. 4.6 for non-HDL-C, and 7.0 vs. 4.6 for triglycerides (all P < .001). With 19 982 new-onset ASCVD events on follow-up, in the adjusted model, residual apoB remained statistically significant after accounting for LDL-C and HDL-C (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.07), after accounting for non-HDL-C and HDL-C (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.06), and after accounting for triglycerides and HDL-C (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.15). None of the residuals of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, or of log triglycerides remained significant when apoB was included in the model.
conclusionsHigh variability of apoB at individual levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides coupled with meaningful differences in 10-year ASCVD rates and significant residual information contained in apoB for prediction of new-onset ASCVD events demonstrate that LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides are not adequate proxies for apoB in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.