Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699802›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2024

Preferences in Clinical Care of Individuals With Differences of Sex Development.

Anton L V Avanceña, Angela M Rose, Melissa D Gardner, Meilan M Rutter, Tara Schafer-Kalkhoff, Kristina I Suorsa-Johnson, Kathleen D van Leeuwen, Erica M Weidler, Acham Gebremariam, David E Sandberg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anton L V AvanceñaHealth Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy.
Angela M RoseSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center (CHEAR), Michigan Medicine.
Melissa D GardnerSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center (CHEAR), Michigan Medicine.
Meilan M RutterDivision of Endocrinology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Tara Schafer-KalkhoffDivision of Endocrinology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Kristina I Suorsa-JohnsonDivision of Pediatric Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Kathleen D van LeeuwenDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Erica M WeidlerDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Acham GebremariamSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center (CHEAR), Michigan Medicine.
David E Sandberg *Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center (CHEAR), Michigan Medicine.
Lisa A Prosser *Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center (CHEAR), Michigan Medicine.

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioK12TR004529 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI ALISON G CAHILL, JOEL TSEVAT · 2023 to 2026
$4.1M
Decision-Making for Patients Born with Differences of Sex Development (DSD)R01HD086583 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SANDBERG, DAVID ERIC · 2016 to 2021
$2.8M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004529NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the most important attributes related to the process of achieving, and outcomes associated with, successful care for differences of sex development (DSD).

methodsWe developed a best-worst scaling survey administered to 520 DSD stakeholders, including individuals or family members of those with DSD, health care specialists, and patient support and advocacy representatives. Fourteen process-related attributes and 16 outcome-related attributes were identified through qualitative research. We estimated relative importance scores and coefficients from regression analysis to understand the relative importance of attributes and conducted latent class analysis to explore heterogeneity in preferences.

resultsThe 3 most important process attributes were (1) good communication between care team and patient/family, (2) care team educated patient/family about condition, and (3) care team incorporates the values of patient/family. The 3 most important outcome attributes were (1) patient satisfaction, (2) patient mental health, and (3) treatment maintains physical health. Latent class analyses showed that respondents had heterogeneous preferences. For process-related attributes, we identified 3 respondent groups: "Patient autonomy and support" (46% of respondents), "Education and care transitions" (18%), and "Shared decision-making" (36%). For outcome-related attributes, we identified 2 respondent groups: "Preserving function and appearance" (59% of respondents) and "Patient health and satisfaction" (41%).

conclusionsOutcomes such as patient satisfaction and health were the most important outcome attributes, and good communication and education from the care team were the most important process attributes. Respondents expressed heterogeneous preferences for selected DSD care attributes that providers should consider to improve satisfaction with and quality of DSD care.

Indexed as

Disorders of Sex DevelopmentPatient PreferenceAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePatient Care TeamPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38699802
PMCPMC11153319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.