Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699763›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2024

Mehak Sikand, Poornima Bhola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehak SikandCurrent Affiliation: Jindal School for Psychology & Counselling, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4444-3183
Poornima BholaDept. of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3371-1226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the relational playground of psychotherapy, negotiating therapeutic distance is crucial for the process as well as the outcome of treatment. The challenge of navigating this closeness and distance may be accentuated during emotionally charged interactions in therapy. Therapist and client may get locked in complementary, rigid positions, leading to either submission or resistance to the others' demands. The therapist's ability to respond appropriately to these pushes and pulls is supported by their ability to mentalize, which is their ability to attend to and understand their own states of mind while being aware of others' states of mind. Therapists are expected to maintain a mentalizing stance throughout and despite the relevance and impact of therapist mentalization, there is relatively less research, training, or practice-related guidance on how to maintain this balance. We use case illustrations to demonstrate therapeutic interactions that can trigger non-mentalizing for the therapist and reflect on ways of recognizing and addressing these patterns related to closeness and distance. We also share recommendations for reflective practice and supervision, training as well as research on therapist mentalization.

Indexed as

mentalizationMentalizationMeSH terms: PsychotherapyPsychotherapytherapeutic allianceTherapeutic alliancetherapeutic distance

Identifiers

PMID38699763
PMCPMC11062303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.