Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699749›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Social, ethical, environmental, economic and technological aspects of rabbit meat production - A critical review.

Shahida Anusha Siddiqui, Danung Nur Adli, Widya Satya Nugraha, Bara Yudhistira, Filipp V Lavrentev, Sergey Shityakov, Xi Feng, Andrey Nagdalian, Salam A Ibrahim

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effects of a Diet ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shahida Anusha SiddiquiTechnical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Essigberg 3, 94315, Straubing, Germany.
Danung Nur AdliFaculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, 65145, Malang, Indonesia.
Widya Satya NugrahaDepartment of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.
Bara YudhistiraDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta City, 57126, Indonesia.
Filipp V LavrentevInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 197101, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Sergey ShityakovLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, Infochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 197101, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Xi FengDepartment of Nutrition, Food Science, and Packaging, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA.
Andrey NagdalianScientific Department, Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University, 196601, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Salam A IbrahimFood and Nutritional Sciences Program, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, 27411, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabbit (RM) has become a valuable source of nutrients since the 1970s, helping to transform the European food industry into the largest RM producer in the world. However, the RM industry is experiencing a critical period of ethical imbalance. This trend, described as feed conversion ratio, impacts the environmental and financial performance of RM farms, which could lead to an increase production of industrial waste. In addition, the loss of corporate ethical responsibility and sustainable development by RM-oriented companies has further exacerbated the situation. Our objective was to summarize current trends in the RM industry and markets, highlighting possible strengths and weaknesses. This review shows current approaches in sustainable techniques in RM production processes, ethical issue, environmental and processing responsibility of RM producers, as well as social responsibilities and ethical practices of slaughterhouses and RM producers, sustainable environmental practices of slaughterhouses, technological aspects and safety of RM and social drivers in RM market. The analysis of reviewed literature revealed the potential strategies for sustainable RM production.

Indexed as

Consumer acceptanceConsumer behaviorCorporative social responsibilityEthical responsibilityFCRRabbit meatSustainable future

Identifiers

PMID38699749
PMCPMC11063435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.