ArticlePhytoKeys2024
Genus
Article in PhytoKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incorporating citizen science into IUCN Red List assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Heathers (PhytoKeys · 2025Review
- Broad-ranged, highly disjunct, locally rare and severely endangered: the challenging risk assessment and a global conservation strategy forPhytoKeys · 2025Article
- An integrative approach to alpha taxonomy inPhytoKeys · 2025Article
- Systematics, natural history, and conservation ofPhytoKeys · 2025Article
- Redefining the megagenusPhytoKeys · 2024Review
- Spatial decoupling of taxon richness, phylogenetic diversity and threat status in the megagenusPhytoKeys · 2024Article
- Article
- Curating an online checklist for Erica L. (Ericaceae): contributing to and supporting global conservation through the World Flora Online.PhytoKeys · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species identification is fundamental to all aspects of biology and conservation. The process can be challenging, particularly in groups including many closely related or similar species. The problem is confounded by the absence of an up-to-date taxonomic revision, but even with such a resource all but professional botanists may struggle to recognise key species, presenting a substantial barrier to vital work such as surveys, threat assessments, and seed collection for ex situ conservation. Genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.