Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

App-based support for breast cancer patients to reduce psychological distress during therapy and survivorship - a multicentric randomized controlled trial.

Josefine Wolff, Svenja Seidel, Pia Wuelfing, Michael Patrick Lux, Christine Zu Eulenburg, Martin Smollich, Freerk Baumann, Stephan Seitz, Sherko Kuemmel, Marc Thill and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Clinical experience and satisfaction in patients with advanced breast cancer participating in the abemaciclib patient support program in Spain: a prospective observational study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Josefine WolffBreast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich (LMU) University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Svenja SeidelDepartment Clinical Research, PINK! Gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Pia WuelfingDepartment Clinical Research, PINK! Gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael Patrick LuxDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise and St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, St. Vincenz Klinik GmbH, Paderborn, Germany.
Christine Zu EulenburgDepartment for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin SmollichInstitute of Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Freerk BaumannDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stephan SeitzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Caritas Hospital St. Josef, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sherko KuemmelBreast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Marc ThillMarkus Hospital, Breast Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
Joke TioDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michael BraunDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Hannah HollaenderBreast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich (LMU) University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Angenla SeitzDepartment Clinical Research, PINK! Gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Felicitas HornDepartment Clinical Research, PINK! Gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBreast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich (LMU) University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Rachel WuerstleinBreast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich (LMU) University Hospital, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The negative impact of unmanaged psychological distress on quality of life and outcome in breast cancer survivors has been demonstrated. Fortunately, studies indicate that distress can effectively be addressed and even prevented using evidence-based interventions. In Germany prescription-based mobile health apps, known as DiGAs (digital health applications), that are fully reimbursed by health insurances, were introduced in 2020. In this study, the effectiveness of an approved breast cancer DiGA was investigated: The personalized coaching app PINK! Coach supports and accompanies breast cancer patients during therapy and follow-up. Methods: PINK! Coach was specifically designed for breast cancer (BC) patients from the day of diagnosis to the time of Follow-up (aftercare). The app offers individualized, evidence-based therapy and side-effect management, mindfulness-based stress reduction, nutritional and psychological education, physical activity tracking, and motivational exercises to implement lifestyle changes sustainably in daily routine. A prospective, intraindividual RCT (DRKS00028699) was performed with n = 434 patients recruited in 7 German breast cancer centers from September 2022 until January 2023. Patients with BC were included independent of their stage of diseases, type of therapy and molecular characteristics of the tumor. Patients were randomized into one of two groups: The intervention group got access to PINK! over 12 weeks; the control group served as a waiting-list comparison to "standard of care." The primary endpoint was psychological distress objectified by means of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Subgroups were defined to investigate the app's effect on several patient groups such as MBC vs. EBC patients, patients on therapy vs. in aftercare, patients who received a chemotherapy vs. patients who did not. Results: Efficacy analysis of the primary endpoint revealed a significant reduction in psychological distress (least squares estimate -1.62, 95% confidence interval [1.03; 2.21]; p<0.001) among intervention group patients from baseline to T3 vs, control group. Subgroup analysis also suggested improvements across all clinical situations. Conclusion: Patients with breast cancer suffer from psychological problems including anxiety and depression during and after therapy. Personalized, supportive care with the app PINK! Coach turned out as a promising opportunity to significantly improve psychological distress in a convenient, accessible, and low-threshold manner for breast cancer patients independent of their stage of disease (EBC/MBC), therapy phase (aftercare or therapy) or therapy itself (chemotherapy/other therapy options). The app is routinely available in Germany as a DiGA. Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS Trial Registry (DRKS00028699).

Indexed as

app-based coachingbreast cancerdepressiondigital interventionpsychological distresssupportive care in cancer

Identifiers

PMID38699636
PMCPMC11064693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.