Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699620›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Decoding temporal muscle synergy patterns based on brain activity for upper extremity in ADL movements.

Mahdie Khaliq Fard, Ali Fallah, Ali Maleki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahdie Khaliq FardBiomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Ali FallahBiomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Ali MalekiSemnan University, Semnan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle synergies have been hypothesized as specific predefined motor primitives that the central nervous system can reduce the complexity of motor control by using them, but how these are expressed in brain activity is ambiguous yet. The main purpose of this paper is to develop synergy-based neural decoding of motor primitives, so for the first time, brain activity and muscle synergy map of the upper extremity was investigated in the activity of daily living movements. To find the relationship between brain activities and muscle synergies, electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) signals were acquired simultaneously during activities of daily living. To extract the maximum correlation of neural commands with muscle synergies, application of a combined partial least squares and canonical correlation analysis (PLS-CCA) method was proposed. The Elman neural network was used to decode the relationship between extracted motor commands and muscle synergies. The performance of proposed method was evaluated with tenfold cross-validation and muscle synergy estimation of brain activity with R, VAF, and MSE of 84 ± 2.6%, 70 ± 4.7%, and 0.00011 ± 0.00002 were quantified respectively. Furthermore, the similarity between actual and reconstructed muscle activations was achieved more than 92% for correlation coefficient. To compare with the existing methods, our results showed significantly more accuracy of the model performance. Our results confirm that use of the expression of muscle synergies in brain activity can estimate the neural decoding performance for motor control that can be used to develop neurorehabilitation tools such as neuroprosthesis.

Indexed as

ADL movementsElectroencephalogramElectromyogramMuscle synergiesPLS-CCAUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID38699620
PMCPMC11061060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.