Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699614›Full record

ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2024

The co-activation patterns of multiple brain regions in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy.

Ming Ke, Lei Hou, Guangyao Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ming KeSchool of Computer and Communication, Lanzhou University of Technology, 730050 Lanzhou, China.
Lei HouSchool of Computer and Communication, Lanzhou University of Technology, 730050 Lanzhou, China.
Guangyao LiuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, 730030 Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) as an idiopathic generalized epilepsy has been studied by many advanced neuroimaging techniques to elucidate its neuroanatomical basis and pathophysiological mechanisms. In this paper, we used co-activation patterns (CAPs) to explore the differences of dynamic brain activity changes in resting state between JME patients and healthy controls. 27 cases JME patients and 27 cases healthy of fMRI data were collected. The structural image data of the subjects were analyzed by voxel-based morphological analysis, and the regions with gray matter volume atrophy and high voxel were selected as the regions of interest. Further, the mean disease duration was used as boundary to divide the patients' data into the below-average time and the above-average time groups, which were defined as patient disease duration groups. And these data were used to construct CAPs and to compare changes in brain dynamics. It was found that the number of patterns occurrences and the possibility of switching between patterns were smaller than those in the healthy control, which indicated patients with damage to brain regions. For the patient time control group, the number of patterns occurrences and the possibility of switching between patterns were similar, while there was linear regression between the three values and disease duration. Collectively, this study provides important evidence for revealing the key brain regions of JME by studying the transformation between CAPs. Future studies could investigate the effects of receiving treatment on patient dynamic brain activity.

Indexed as

Co-activation patternsDynamic brain activityfMRIJuvenile Myoclonic EpilepsyVoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID38699614
PMCPMC11061087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.