ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024
Analyzing the risk factors of unilateral trigeminal neuralgia under neurovascular compression.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reciprocal association between neurovascular conflict and trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia secondary to multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Pooled it
- Trigger zones in trigeminal neuralgia: clinical features, pathophysiological mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Glymphatic and neurofluidic dysfunction in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a multimodal MRI study of brain-CSF functional and structural dynamics.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore the risk factors and potential causes of unilateral classical or idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (C-ITN) by comparing patients and healthy controls (HCs) with neurovascular compression (NVC) using machine learning (ML). Methods: A total of 84 C-ITN patients and 78 age- and sex-matched HCs were enrolled. We assessed the trigeminal pons angle and identified the compressing vessels and their location and severity. Machine learning was employed to analyze the cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve (CN V). Results: Among the C-ITN patients, 53 had NVC on the unaffected side, while 25 HCs exhibited bilateral NVC, and 24 HCs showed unilateral NVC. By comparing the cisternal segment of CN V between C-ITN patients on the affected side and HCs with NVC, we identified the side of NVC, the compressing vessel, and certain texture features as risk factors for C-ITN. Additionally, four texture features differed in the structure of the cisternal segment of CN V between C-ITN patients on the unaffected side and HCs with NVC. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the side of NVC, the compressing vessel, and the microstructure of the cisternal segment of CN V are associated with the risk of C-ITN. Furthermore, microstructural changes observed in the cisternal segment of CN V on the unaffected side of C-ITN patients with NVC indicate possible indirect effects on the CN V to some extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.