ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
Spiking neural networks for nonlinear regression.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spiking Neural Networks with Continual Learning for Steering Angle Regression: A Sustainable AI Perspective.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SPCNNet: spiking point cloud neural network for morphological neuron classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing time scalability of spiking neural networks with dynamic time constants.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic olfaction with ultralow-power gas sensors and ovonic threshold switch.Science advances · 2025Article
- A Comparative Study of Network-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Binary Classification in Metabolomics.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Cardiac Heterogeneity Prediction by Cardio-Neural Network Simulation.Neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- Spiking neural networks for nonlinear regression.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiking neural networks (SNN), also often referred to as the third generation of neural networks, carry the potential for a massive reduction in memory and energy consumption over traditional, second-generation neural networks. Inspired by the undisputed efficiency of the human brain, they introduce temporal and neuronal sparsity, which can be exploited by next-generation neuromorphic hardware. Energy efficiency plays a crucial role in many engineering applications, for instance, in structural health monitoring. Machine learning in engineering contexts, especially in data-driven mechanics, focuses on regression. While regression with SNN has already been discussed in a variety of publications, in this contribution, we provide a novel formulation for its accuracy and energy efficiency. In particular, a network topology for decoding binary spike trains to real numbers is introduced, using the membrane potential of spiking neurons. Several different spiking neural architectures, ranging from simple spiking feed-forward to complex spiking long short-term memory neural networks, are derived. Since the proposed architectures do not contain any dense layers, they exploit the full potential of SNN in terms of energy efficiency. At the same time, the accuracy of the proposed SNN architectures is demonstrated by numerical examples, namely different material models. Linear and nonlinear, as well as history-dependent material models, are examined. While this contribution focuses on mechanical examples, the interested reader may regress any custom function by adapting the published source code.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.