ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
Generalizability of foot placement control strategies during unperturbed and perturbed gait.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proactive adjustments to cued gait perturbations in people with and without chronic stroke.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Proactive adjustments to cued gait perturbations in people with and without chronic stroke.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Generalizability of foot placement control strategies during unperturbed and perturbed gait.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Balance strategies for recovery from perturbed overground walking.Journal of biomechanics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Control of foot placement is an essential strategy for maintaining balance during walking. During unperturbed, steady-state walking, foot placement can be accurately described as a linear function of the body's centre of mass (CoM) state at midstance. However, it is uncertain if this mapping from CoM state to foot placement generalizes to larger perturbations that could potentially cause falls. Recovery from these perturbations may require reactive control strategies not observed during unperturbed walking. Here, we used unpredictable changes in treadmill belt speed to assess the generalizability of foot placement mappings identified during unperturbed walking. We found that foot placement mappings generalized poorly from unperturbed to perturbed walking and differed for forward perturbation versus backward perturbation. We also used the singular value decomposition of the mapping matrix to reveal that people were more sensitive to backward versus forward perturbations. Together, these results indicate that a single linear mapping cannot describe the foot placement control during both forward and backward losses of balance induced by treadmill belt speed perturbations. Better characterization of human balance control strategies could improve our understanding of why different neuromotor disorders result in heightened fall risk and inform the design of controllers for balance-assisting devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.