ArticleNature and science of sleep2024
A Machine Learning Prediction Model of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Systematically Evaluated Common Clinical Biochemical Indicators.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turing problems in otolaryngology: a scoping review of the principal challenges of artificial ıntelligence and large language models.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Critically Ill Patients: A Structured Narrative Review of Prevalence, Diagnostic Barriers, and Clinical Implications in the ICU.Clocks & sleep · 2026Review
- Ultrasonographic Assessment of Upper Airway Structures in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning approach for predicting the severity risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- Integrating Complete Blood Count Parameters with Demographic Characteristics for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Prediction in Chinese Adults: A Machine Learning Approach.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- ACF-SAP: A machine learning framework for predicting obstructive sleep apnea severity using anthropometric and clinical features.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Hematological Biomarkers of the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Machine Learning-Based Diagnostic and Prognostic Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Dual-Branch CNN and Machine Learning Models.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Advances in Machine Learning Prediction Models for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Review
- Association Between Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR) and Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Analysis of NHANES Database and a Chinese Cohort.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- From Big Data to AI-Driven Decisions in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Narrative Review Integrating the DDPP Framework.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Review
- A Machine Learning Prediction Model of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Systematically Evaluated Common Clinical Biochemical Indicators.Nature and science of sleep · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and potentially fatal sleep disorder. The purpose of this study was to construct an objective and easy-to-promote model based on common clinical biochemical indicators and demographic data for OSA screening. Methods: The study collected the clinical data of patients who were referred to the Sleep Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from December 1, 2020, to July 31, 2023, including data for demographics, polysomnography (PSG), and 30 biochemical indicators. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the differences between groups, and the Boruta method was used to analyze the importance of the predictors. We selected and compared 10 predictors using 4 machine learning algorithms which were "Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB)", "Support Vector Machine (SVM)", "K Neighbors Classifier (KNN)", and "Logistic Regression (LR)". Finally, the optimal algorithm was selected to construct the final prediction model. Results: Among all the predictors of OSA, body mass index (BMI) showed the best predictive efficacy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.699; among the predictors of biochemical indicators, triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index represented the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.656). The LR algorithm outperformed the 4 established machine learning (ML) algorithms, with an AUC (F1 score) of 0.794 (0.841), 0.777 (0.827), and 0.732 (0.788) in the training, validation, and testing cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: We have constructed an efficient OSA screening tool. The introduction of biochemical indicators in ML-based prediction models can provide a reference for clinicians in determining whether patients with suspected OSA need PSG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.