SynthesisPeerJ2024
Association between passing return-to-sport testing and re-injury risk in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06768957 (Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the "Single Hop Test" Combined With a Cognitive Task, to Optimize Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the "Single Hop Test" Combined With a Cognitive Task, to Optimize Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative Quadriceps Symmetry, Knee Laxity, and Single-Leg Hop Performance in Association with 24-Month Ipsilateral Graft Retear After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- On-field rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament injury in contact team sports: a scoping review of exercises, progression and key principles.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
- Functional Asymmetries After 6 Months of ACL Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Study.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Establishing Threshold Values for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for the Self Knee Value and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Scale.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Rehabilitation Characteristics Among High, Average, and Low Performers on Return-to-Sport Testing in Athletes After ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- How Can We Optimize a Safe Return to Sport for Youth Athletes? Emerging Concepts and Perspectives - Multidisciplinary Approach.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Knee and ankle biomechanics during recovery from primary, secondary, and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a quasi-experimental study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Inconsistent results have been obtained regarding the association between return-to-sport (RTS) testing and the risk of subsequent re-injury following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential association between passing of RTS and the risk of re-injury for patients after ACLR. Methods: This meta-analysis was registered in INPLASY with the registration number INPLASY202360027. The electronic databases MedLine, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to identify eligible studies from their inception up to September 2023. The investigated outcomes included knee injury, secondary ACL, contralateral ACL injury, and graft rupture. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Results: A total number of nine studies involving 1410 individuals were selected for the final quantitative analysis. We noted that passing RTS test was not associated with the risk of subsequent knee injury (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.28-3.21; Conclusions: This study found that passing RTS test was not associated with the risk of subsequent knee injury, secondary ACL injury, and contralateral ACL injury, while it was associated with a lower risk of graft rupture. Thus, it is recommended that patients after ACLR pass an RTS test in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.