Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699195›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Variational Bayesian phylogenies through matrix representation of tree space.

Remco R Bouckaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Remco R BouckaertSchool of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we study the distance matrix as a representation of a phylogeny by way of hierarchical clustering. By defining a multivariate normal distribution on (a subset of) the entries in a matrix, this allows us to represent a distribution over rooted time trees. Here, we demonstrate tree distributions can be represented accurately this way for a number of published tree distributions. Though such a representation does not map to unique trees, restriction to a subspace, in particular one we call a "cube", makes the representation bijective at the cost of not being able to represent all possible trees. We introduce an algorithm "cubeVB" specifically for cubes and show through well calibrated simulation study that it is possible to recover parameters of interest like tree height and length. Although a cube cannot represent all of tree space, it is a great improvement over a single summary tree, and it opens up exciting new opportunities for scaling up Bayesian phylogenetic inference. We also demonstrate how to use a matrix representation of a tree distribution to get better summary trees than commonly used maximum clade credibility trees. An open source implementation of the cubeVB algorithm is available from https://github.com/rbouckaert/cubevb as the cubevb package for BEAST 2.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremPhylogenyCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationBayesian phylogeneticsBEAST 2Summary treesTree spaceVariational Bayes

Identifiers

PMID38699195
PMCPMC11064865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.