Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699183›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Density of cannabis outlets

Wit Wichaidit, Ilham Chapakiya, Aneesah Waeuseng, Kemmapon Chumchuen, Sawitri Assanangkornchai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wit WichaiditDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla Province, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2029-4934
Ilham ChapakiyaDivision of Computational Science (Statistics), Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla Province, Thailand.
Aneesah WaeusengDivision of Computational Science (Statistics), Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla Province, Thailand.
Kemmapon ChumchuenDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla Province, Thailand.
Sawitri AssanangkornchaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla Province, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2174-3287

Funding

Thailand’s Health Systems Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thailand recently decriminalized ( Methods: We conducted a community-based cross-sectional study in 11 provinces and the Bangkok Metropolitan Area. Participants were residents of sampled communities aged 20 years or older. We requested literate participants to self-administer the questionnaire and interviewed participants who could not read. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics with sampling weight adjustments and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: The prevalence of current cannabis use was 15 percent. At a 400-m radius, participants who reported three cannabis outlets had 4.2 times higher odds of being current users than participants who reported no outlet (Adjusted OR = 4.82; 95% CI [3.04-7.63]). We found no association between outlet density and hazardous cannabis use or cannabis use disorder, nor association with the amount of cannabis use among cannabis smokers. Discussion and Conclusion: The patterns of association between outlet density and cannabis use behaviors were inconsistent. Furthermore, limitations regarding outlet density measurement and lack of temporality should be considered as caveats in the interpretation of the study findings.

Indexed as

CommerceMarijuana AbuseAdultCannabisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingMarijuana UseMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandYoung AdultCannabisCannabis use disorderDrug useOutlet densityThailand

Identifiers

PMID38699183
PMCPMC11064851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.