Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38699132›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Academic Engagement of Women as Orthopaedic Surgeons at the Annual Meetings of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association From 2012 to 2022.

Satomi Nagamine, Tadatsugu Morimoto, Yumi Niizeki, Kazuyo Yamauchi, Naomi Oizumi, Hirohito Hirata, Shiori Tanaka, Masatsugu Tsukamoto, Takaomi Kobayashi, Masaaki Mawatari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Satomi NagamineDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Tadatsugu MorimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Yumi NiizekiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soka Municipal Hospital, Soka, JPN.
Kazuyo YamauchiDepartment of Community-Oriented Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.
Naomi OizumiUpper Extremity Center of Joint Replacement and Endoscopic Surgery, Hokushin Orthopaedic Hospital, Sapporo, JPN.
Hirohito HirataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Shiori TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Masatsugu TsukamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Takaomi KobayashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Masaaki MawatariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University, Saga, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigher gender diversity correlates with higher patient satisfaction, higher-quality medical education, increased research productivity, and higher revenues. Although the field of Japanese orthopaedic surgery includes the lowest proportion of women and lags in gender diversity, reports on the current gender diversity status in academic activities are scarce. We investigated changes in women's participation in academic activities at the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) annual meetings over the past 11 years.

methodsData on the percentage of women in the JOA membership during 2012-2022 were analyzed to ascertain the proportion of women as first authors of oral and poster presentations, abstract reviewers, invited lecturers, seminar lecturers, general abstract oral chairpersons, symposium chairpersons, and speakers. Regarding the ratio of women among the JOA members during 2012-2022, we relied on data provided by the JOA. Data related to other categories were collected from the abstract book presented at the JOA Annual Meetings between 2012 and 2022. We analyzed the time trend for women's proportions using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsDuring 2012-2022, the percentage of female members (4.9-6.7%), poster first authors (2.7-4.3%), abstract reviewers (0-1.5%), general abstract oral chairpersons (0-2.3%), symposium chairpersons (0-3.6%), and symposium speakers (1.6-6.8%) had increased significantly (p < 0.05). Oral first authors (2.2-4.1%), invited lecturers (0-6.8%), or seminar lecturers (0%-6.7%) showed no trend. Women engaged in academic activities at all annual association meetings did not exceed the women's proportion among the association members.

conclusionAlthough the proportion of women members of the JOA has gradually increased and more women are involved in its annual meetings, the proportion of female presenters, invited speakers, symposiasts, and chairpersons of oral and poster presentations is generally lower than that of women as JOA members. Members should be asked to raise awareness, including more active education of women as physicians in educational institutions and the creation of positive actions to select women as physicians for more important roles (chairpersons, educational speakers, and symposiasts) in the organization of annual meetings.

Indexed as

gender diversityjapanese orthopaedic associationnegative stereotypeorthopaedicsquota system

Identifiers

PMID38699132
PMCPMC11065480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.