ReviewCureus2024
Comparison of Adenosine Deaminase, C-reactive Protein, Uric Acid, and Rheumatoid Arthritis Levels in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Those Without Arthritis: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nucleotide Metabolism in Health and Disease.MedComm · 2026Review
- Genetic and epigenetic contribution of ABCG2 to gout susceptibility: a case-control study.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Serum Biochemical Markers and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Insights From Observational Study and Mendelian Randomization Analysis.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025Article
- Serum uric acid predictive value and prognostic impact in rheumatoid arthritis' associated interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Pain mechanism and management strategy of rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the hallmarks of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is inflammation of the synovial membrane, and oxidative stress is a mediator of tissue damage. RA is characterized by persistent joint inflammation, which leads to pain, edema, and finally joint destruction. Numerous biochemical markers can cause RA because of their impact on systemic and local inflammation. Numerous biomarkers have been investigated for their potential application in the diagnosis and prognosis of RA. In this review article, we evaluate the role of RA factor or rheumatoid factor (RF), uric acid, C-reactive protein (CRP), and adenosine deaminases (ADAs) as biomarkers in patients with and without arthritis. Studies that analyze and compare the levels of uric acid, ADAs, CRP, and RF in patients with and without arthritis. Although recent research has shown higher levels of uric acid, ADA, CRP, and RA in patients with RF compared to healthy controls, these findings may indicate a role for these markers in reflecting inflammation and disease activity. In the metabolism of purines, the enzyme ADA is involved. The liver produces CRP, which is then released into the bloodstream. In inflammatory situations, there is a rise in CRP levels. This biomarker is frequently used for systemic inflammatory assessment in RA. The pathophysiology and severity of RA have both been connected to uric acid, which has historically been linked to gout. One particular biomarker for RA is RF. When compared to a healthy control group of individuals with arthritis, this review provides valuable insights into the diagnostic and prognostic use of uric acid, CRP, ADAs, and RF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.