ArticleHeliyon2024
Validation of Bengali version of EORTC QLQ-SWB32: A standalone measure of spiritual wellbeing for advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spiritual wellbeing (SWB) is one of the crucial components of holistic care for patients with terminal illnesses. The use of a validated instrument can help health professionals approach this difficult and subjective topic. There is no validated Bengali tool to measure this domain. Our study aimed to translate the EORTC QLQ SWB32 tool into Bengali, validate it among advanced cancer patients in Bangladesh, and compare the study's findings to international validation studies to determine its suitability as a measurement and intervention tool for these patients. Methods: The original English version of the tool was translated in Bengali and back-translated by four independent translators with good command in both languages. After approval from the EORTC translation team and linguistic validation, the tool was further validated among 163 advanced cancer patients from palliative care units of four tertiary-level hospitals in Bangladesh. Reliability was tested with Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity was determined by exploratory factor analysis. Known group comparisons were performed by the Kruskal-Wallis H test and the Mann-Whitney Result: Ten adult cancer patients (two female and eight male, three Hindu and seven Muslim) participated in the linguistic validation. Six out of ten participants found the measure understandable and acceptable. A total of 163 advanced cancer patients participated in the psychometric validation phase. The majority of those participants were Muslims (94 %), with a slight male predominance. The internal consistency of each scale was satisfactory (0.7). Exploratory factor analysis also showed similarity to the original scale except item 12 (able to forgive others), which was loaded in both the EX and RO components (0.813 and 0.544, respectively). Older patients had a better relationship with themselves and a lower level of existential fulfilment than the younger group. Patients who tried to find comfort in their religion or spiritual faith, actively performed religious rituals, and had affiliations with religious or spiritual communities showed significantly higher global SWB. Conclusion: The Bengali version of the EORTC QLQ-SWB32 is a reliable and valid tool for measuring the spiritual wellbeing of advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.