ArticleHeliyon2024
Development and validation of a machine-learning model for predicting the risk of death in sepsis patients with acute kidney injury.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning-based mortality risk prediction models in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning for the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Precise Discrimination Between Rape Honey and Acacia Honey Based on Sugar and Amino Acid Profiles Combined with Machine Learning.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Codes in AI Prediction Models and Label Leakage of Same-Admission Clinical Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Associations of lactate-to-hematocrit ratio with short- and long-term prognoses in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Native Infective Endocarditis: A State-of-the-Art-Review.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Which Types of Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Benefit From Radiotherapy? A Retrospective Study Integrating Machine Learning With the SEER Database and a Chinese Cohort.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mortality rate of patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is notably elevated. The initial categorization of prognostic indicators has a beneficial impact on elucidating and enhancing disease outcomes. This study aimed to predict the mortality risk of S-AKI patients by employing machine learning techniques. The sample size determined by a four-step procedure yielded 1508 samples. The research design necessitated the inclusion of individuals with S-AKI from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. The patients were initially admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for their hospital stay. Additionally, these patients (aged from 18 to 89 years old) had encountered S-AKI on the day of their admittance. Forty-two predictive factors were analyzed, with hospitalization death as the outcome variable. The training set (4001 cases) consisted of 70 % of the participants, and the remaining (1714 cases) participants were allocated to the validation set. Furthermore, an additional validation set (MIMIC-III) consisted of 1757 patients from the MIMIC-III database. Moreover, an external validation set from the Intensive Care Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital (BFH) comprised 72 patients. Six machine learning models were employed in the prediction, namely the logistic, lasso, rpart, random forest, xgboost, and artificial neural network models. The comparative efficacy of the newly developed model in relation to the APACHE II model for predicting mortality risk was also assessed. The XGBoost model exhibited a superior performance with the training set. With the internal validation set and the two external validation sets (MIMIC-III and BFH), the xgboost algorithm demonstrated the highest performance. Meanwhile, APACHE II performed poorly at predicting the mortality risk with the BFH validation set. The mortality risk was influenced by three primary clinical parameters: urine volume, lactate, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Thus, we developed a prediction model for the risk of death among S-AKI patients that has an improved performance compared to previous models and is a potentially valuable tool for S-AKI prediction and treatment in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.