Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698997›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

A comprehensive review on internet of things task offloading in multi-access edge computing.

Wang Dayong, Kamalrulnizam Bin Abu Bakar, Babangida Isyaku, Taiseer Abdalla Elfadil Eisa, Abdelzahir Abdelmaboud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wang DayongDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia.
Kamalrulnizam Bin Abu BakarDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia.
Babangida IsyakuDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia.
Taiseer Abdalla Elfadil EisaDepartment of Information Systems-Girls Section, King Khalid University, Mahayil, 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Abdelzahir AbdelmaboudHumanities Research Center Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) technology, Terminal Devices (TDs) are more inclined to offload computing tasks to higher-performance computing servers, thereby solving the problems of insufficient computing capacity and rapid battery consumption of TD. The emergence of Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) technology provides new opportunities for IoT task offloading. It allows TDs to access computing networks through multiple communication technologies and supports more mobility of terminal devices. Review studies on IoT task offloading and MEC have been extensive, but none of them focus on IoT task offloading in MEC. To fill this gap, this paper provides a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the algorithms and mechanisms of multiple IoT task offloading in the MEC network. For each paper, the main problems solved by the mechanism, technical classification, evaluation methods, and supported parameters are extracted and analyzed. Furthermore, shortcomings of current research and future research trends are discussed. This review will help potential and new researchers quickly understand the panorama of IoT task offloading approaches in MEC and find appropriate research paths.

Indexed as

Computation offloadingInternet of thingsMobile edge computingMulti-access edge computingTask offloading

Identifiers

PMID38698997
PMCPMC11064154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.