Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698887›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

Sushil K Shakyawar, Balasrinivasa R Sajja, Jai Chand Patel, Chittibabu Guda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ovarian Cancer: Multi-Omics Data Integration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. From Stress to Synapse: The Neuronal Atrophy Pathway to Mood Dysregulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Multi-omics approaches for image classification in disease diagnosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sushil K ShakyawarDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.
Balasrinivasa R SajjaDepartment of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.
Jai Chand PatelDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.
Chittibabu GudaDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-9316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Patient stratification is crucial for the effective treatment or management of heterogeneous diseases, including cancers. Multiomic technologies facilitate molecular characterization of human diseases; however, the complexity of data warrants the need for the development of robust data integration tools for patient stratification using machine-learning approaches. Results: Availability and implementation: Source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/GudaLab/iCluF_core.

Identifiers

PMID38698887
PMCPMC11063539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.