Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698777›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

ED

Jinming Chen, Xiaoling Li, Zilan Hu, Yuling Zheng, Ying Mai, Zhongqi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinming Chen *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University, Foshan, China.
Xiaoling Li *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University, Foshan, China.
Zilan HuDepartment of Gynecology, The Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University, Foshan, China.
Yuling ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University, Foshan, China.
Ying MaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University, Foshan, China.
Zhongqi ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University, Foshan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Remimazolam (RMZ) is a novel intravenous sedative drug of ultra-short benzodiazepine. The optimal dose of RMZ plus butorphanol for sedation during first trimester artificial abortion is unknown. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the median effective dose (ED Methods: Sixty-one female patients were randomly assigned to Group B10 (31 patients) and Group B15 (30 patients). RMZ was administered 5 min after IV butorphanol at doses of 10 μg/kg (Group B10) and 15 μg/kg (Group B15). Cervical dilatation at the time of using a cervical dilating rod, if the patient has body movement and affects the gynecologist's operation, we define it as "Ineffective." Therefore, the dose of RMZ was increased in the next patient. Otherwise, it was defined as "Effective," and the dose of RMZ was reduced in the next patient. According to the pre-experiment, the first dose of RMZ in the first patient was 0.35 mg/kg, and the adjacent geometric dose ratio was 0.9. The centered isotonic regression was performed to determine the ED Results: The ED Conclusion: The ED50 of RMZ combined with a 10 μg/kg or 15 μg/kg dose of butorphanol was 0.263 and 0.224 mg/kg during painless first trimester artificial abortion. However, RMZ combined with a 10 μg/kg dose of butorphanol seems to have a shorter recovery time. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=166623.

Indexed as

butorphanoleffective dosepainless abortionremimazolamup-and-down method

Identifiers

PMID38698777
PMCPMC11063231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.