Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38698612›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2024

Case Report on Caries Assessment Using Intraoral Scanner Compared with Bitewing Radiographs.

Bernard Siew, Joachim Enax, Frederic Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernard SiewSmilefocus, Camden Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Joachim EnaxResearch Department, Dr. Kurt Wolff GmbH & Co. KG, Bielefeld, Germany.
Frederic MeyerResearch Department, Dr. Kurt Wolff GmbH & Co. KG, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries remains one of the main reasons patients seeing their dentist. They either show up for preventive measures, diagnostics, or treatment of present caries lesions. To date, diagnostics are performed visually, supported by using bitewing radiographs. While radiographic diagnostics should only be performed on a biannual basis, and some caries process will not be seen with visual diagnostics, there remains a lack in regular checkups. Therefore, different technical applications can be used for regular diagnostics. One of those is the near-infrared imaging (NIRI) technology. In this case report, a patient presented with incipient caries lesions. These lesions were diagnosed visually, radiographically, and using NIRI. After diagnosis of incipient caries lesions, the patient was advised to use a hydroxyapatite toothpaste and a hydroxyapatite gel for the remineralization of the lesions and prevention of caries progression. The patient was followed up for 6 months with regular checkups in between. Visual diagnostics and NIRI were used to detecting the caries progress. After 6 months, bitewing radiographs were used in addition. In this clinical investigation we were able to show for the first time that NIRI and bitewing radiographs are able to detect and follow incipient caries lesions. Additionally, this study highlights that hydroxyapatite-containing oral care products are able to arrest and remineralize the caries process.

Identifiers

PMID38698612
PMCPMC11290935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.