ReviewBMC biomedical engineering2024
On the role of generative artificial intelligence in the development of brain-computer interfaces.
Review in BMC biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Assistive Technologies for Tetraplegia: A Narrative Review of Systematic and Emerging Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating AI and Assistive Technologies in Healthcare: Insights from a Narrative Review of Reviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Leveraging psychedelic neuroscience to boost human creativity using artificial intelligence.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- The neurophysiology of sensorimotor prosthetic control.BMC biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Factors influencing the social acceptance of brain-computer interface technology among Chinese general public: an exploratory study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since their inception more than 50 years ago, Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) have held promise to compensate for functions lost by people with disabilities through allowing direct communication between the brain and external devices. While research throughout the past decades has demonstrated the feasibility of BCI to act as a successful assistive technology, the widespread use of BCI outside the lab is still beyond reach. This can be attributed to a number of challenges that need to be addressed for BCI to be of practical use including limited data availability, limited temporal and spatial resolutions of brain signals recorded non-invasively and inter-subject variability. In addition, for a very long time, BCI development has been mainly confined to specific simple brain patterns, while developing other BCI applications relying on complex brain patterns has been proven infeasible. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has recently emerged as an artificial intelligence domain in which trained models can be used to generate new data with properties resembling that of available data. Given the enhancements observed in other domains that possess similar challenges to BCI development, GAI has been recently employed in a multitude of BCI development applications to generate synthetic brain activity; thereby, augmenting the recorded brain activity. Here, a brief review of the recent adoption of GAI techniques to overcome the aforementioned BCI challenges is provided demonstrating the enhancements achieved using GAI techniques in augmenting limited EEG data, enhancing the spatiotemporal resolution of recorded EEG data, enhancing cross-subject performance of BCI systems and implementing end-to-end BCI applications. GAI could represent the means by which BCI would be transformed into a prevalent assistive technology, thereby improving the quality of life of people with disabilities, and helping in adopting BCI as an emerging human-computer interaction technology for general use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.